Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more options for specific validation function #63

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

yashpatel6
Copy link
Collaborator

  • I have read the code review guidelines and the code review best practice on GitHub check-list.

  • I have reviewed the Nextflow pipeline standards.

  • The name of the branch is meaningful and well formatted following the standards, using [AD_username (or 5 letters of AD if AD is too long)]-[brief_description_of_branch].

  • I have set up or verified the branch protection rule following the github standards before opening this pull request.

  • I have added my name to the contributors listings in the
    metadata.yaml and the manifest block in the nextflow.config as part of this pull request, am listed
    already, or do not wish to be listed. (This acknowledgement is optional.)

  • I have added the changes included in this pull request to the CHANGELOG.md under the next release version or unreleased, and updated the date.

  • I have updated the version number in the metadata.yaml and manifest block of the nextflow.config file following semver, or the version number has already been updated. (Leave it unchecked if you are unsure about new version number and discuss it with the infrastructure team in this PR.)

  • I have tested the config being added or modified. Outline the tests below.

Updating the specific validation function to accept either a path to schema.yaml or the result of loading the schema into a Map. Used in cases where the schema needs to be modified depending on certain parameters to disable/enable certain parameters prior to validation. Tested with metapipeline-DNA at uclahs-cds/metapipeline-DNA#194

@yashpatel6 yashpatel6 requested review from tyamaguchi-ucla, zhuchcn and a team as code owners April 26, 2024 21:45
Copy link
Member

@nwiltsie nwiltsie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@yashpatel6 yashpatel6 merged commit af6a606 into main Apr 29, 2024
6 checks passed
@yashpatel6 yashpatel6 deleted the yashpatel-generalize-specific-validation branch April 29, 2024 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants