Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix issue where method to determine matched wt result didn't return where appropriate #1082

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024
Merged

Fix issue where method to determine matched wt result didn't return where appropriate #1082

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

susannasiebert
Copy link
Contributor

Close #1081

@susannasiebert susannasiebert changed the base branch from master to hotfix March 12, 2024 19:00
@susannasiebert susannasiebert force-pushed the issue_1081 branch 2 times, most recently from 07cd624 to 3a8e8a6 Compare March 12, 2024 19:22
acoffman
acoffman approved these changes Mar 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@acoffman acoffman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@susannasiebert susannasiebert merged commit dd495dd into hotfix Mar 13, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@susannasiebert susannasiebert deleted the issue_1081 branch June 3, 2024 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@acoffman acoffman acoffman approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''
2 participants
@susannasiebert @acoffman