-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add proto + logic for streaming sequence #1266
Conversation
a2c715a
to
9614706
Compare
Moving back to draft status while things are failing - guessing it's because we're modifying the proto and not the logic, but that's just a guess |
b6e8382
to
e28f6fe
Compare
(sorry for all of the force pushes - not my norm. I was rebasing to try to get co-authors working and there was a bit of trial and error with syntax - finally figured it out!) |
e28f6fe
to
4bc5146
Compare
Co-authored-by: Leah Cole <coleleah@google.com> Co-authored-by: Gal Zahavi <galzahavi@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Leah Cole <coleleah@google.com> Co-authored-by: Gal Zahavi <galzahavi@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Leah Cole <coleleah@google.com> Co-authored-by: Gal Zahavi <galzahavi@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Leah Cole <coleleah@google.com> Co-authored-by: Gal Zahavi <galzahavi@google.com>
4bc5146
to
ebcb42c
Compare
Co-authored-by: Leah E. Cole <leahecole@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Leah E. Cole <leahecole@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Leah E. Cole <leahecole@users.noreply.github.com>
I think the RPC name is |
i accidentally miss typed in the comment , if you look at the failing tests its not missing the
|
Oh, ok I just suggested a fix. The getters on a generated message e.g. |
Co-authored-by: Noah Dietz <noahdietz@users.noreply.github.com>
still failing |
Was everything regenerated? Any time a proto is changed, the code needs to be regenerated and the handlers need to be updated |
yes it was regenerated, even if i change the |
@noahdietz So it looks like line 53 in sequence.proto needs to be |
Update your branch as #1293 has been merged. Then reinstall |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implementation is looking great, just the one question on the proto
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great job the both of you.
Hi Noah! Per our conversation on Friday, @galz10 and I are proposing these changes to the proto - we think it should be the same as
AttemptSequence
in the proto but the underlying logic will be different, and that the other methods are reusable. Let us know if we're off base!