Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add spec for default value in given block #1812

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2018

Conversation

darren987469
Copy link
Contributor

Add spec for #1681. The issue seems already fixed.

@grape-bot
Copy link

grape-bot commented Nov 2, 2018

1 Warning
⚠️ Unless you’re refactoring existing code, please update CHANGELOG.md.
1 Message
📖 We really appreciate pull requests that demonstrate issues, even without a fix. That said, the next step is to try and fix the failing tests!

Here's an example of a CHANGELOG.md entry:

* [#1812](/~https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape/pull/1812): Add spec for default value in given block - [@darren987469](/~https://github.com/darren987469).

Generated by 🚫 danger

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Nov 2, 2018

There's some dependency/ruby version changes that failed the build here. Appreciate if you could please try to fix that? Upgrading those rubies seems to be the right way to go. Thanks.

@darren987469
Copy link
Contributor Author

I open another PR to add ruby 2.5 support and drop 2.2 support (#1813 ). After 1813 merged, I will rebase it and CI should pass.

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Nov 3, 2018

Merged it, thanks @darren987469

@darren987469 darren987469 force-pushed the add_spec_for_issue_1681 branch from bc6136c to 513f857 Compare November 3, 2018 23:05
@darren987469
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dblock Rebased and CI passes!

@dblock dblock merged commit 16ce342 into ruby-grape:master Nov 4, 2018
@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Nov 4, 2018

Merged, thank you.

@darren987469 darren987469 deleted the add_spec_for_issue_1681 branch November 4, 2018 04:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants