Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use new rendering methods of coverage model #418

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

Conversation

uhafner
Copy link
Owner

@uhafner uhafner commented Feb 13, 2025

See coverage-model for details.

@uhafner uhafner added the enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality label Feb 13, 2025
Copy link

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: No test results available
   〰️   Line Coverage: 0% (0 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 0% (0 missed branches)
   CheckStyle   CheckStyle: No warnings
   PMD   PMD: No warnings
   SpotBugs   SpotBugs: No bugs
   🌀   Cyclomatic Complexity: <n/a>
   💭   Cognitive Complexity: <n/a>
   📏   Lines of Code: <n/a>
   📝   Non Commenting Source Statements: <n/a>
   🔭   Access to foreign data: <n/a>
   🔗   Class cohesion: <n/a>
   📤   Fan out: <n/a>
   📲   Number of accessors: <n/a>
   ⚖️   Weight of a class: <n/a>
   📐   Weighted method count: <n/a>
   ➿   N-Path Complexity: <n/a>


🚧   Error Messages

Quality Monitor Errors:
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/*-reports/TEST*.xml'! Configuration error for 'Tests'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml'! Configuration error for 'Line Coverage'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml'! Configuration error for 'Branch Coverage'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/**checkstyle-result.xml'! Configuration error for 'CheckStyle'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/pmd-*/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'PMD'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/target/spotbugsXml.xml'! Configuration error for 'SpotBugs'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Cyclomatic Complexity'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Cognitive Complexity'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Lines of Code'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Non Commenting Source Statements'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Access to foreign data'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Class cohesion'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Fan out'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Number of accessors'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Weight of a class'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'Weighted method count'?
No matching report files found when using pattern '**/metrics/pmd.xml'! Configuration error for 'N-Path Complexity'?

Created by Quality Monitor v1.14.0 (#f3859fd). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

Copy link

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 99% successful (❌ 1 failed, ✔️ 167 passed)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 87% (164 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 84% (54 missed branches)
   CheckStyle   CheckStyle: No warnings
   PMD   PMD: No warnings
   SpotBugs   SpotBugs: No bugs
   🌀   Cyclomatic Complexity: 523 (total)
   💭   Cognitive Complexity: 194 (total)
   📏   Lines of Code: 4534 (total)
   📝   Non Commenting Source Statements: 1677 (total)
   🔭   Access to foreign data: 274 (total)
   🔗   Class cohesion: 100.00% (maximum)
   📤   Fan out: 551 (total)
   📲   Number of accessors: 53 (total)
   ⚖️   Weight of a class: 100.00% (maximum)
   📐   Weighted method count: 599 (total)
   ➿   N-Path Complexity: 891 (total)


Created by Quality Monitor v1.14.0 (#f3859fd). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

Copy link

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 96% successful (❌ 6 failed, ✔️ 162 passed)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 87% (164 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 84% (54 missed branches)
   CheckStyle   CheckStyle: No warnings
   PMD   PMD: No warnings
   SpotBugs   SpotBugs: No bugs
   🌀   Cyclomatic Complexity: 523 (total)
   💭   Cognitive Complexity: 194 (total)
   📏   Lines of Code: 4534 (total)
   📝   Non Commenting Source Statements: 1677 (total)
   🔭   Access to foreign data: 274 (total)
   🔗   Class cohesion: 100.00% (maximum)
   📤   Fan out: 551 (total)
   📲   Number of accessors: 53 (total)
   ⚖️   Weight of a class: 100.00% (maximum)
   📐   Weighted method count: 599 (total)
   ➿   N-Path Complexity: 891 (total)


Created by Quality Monitor v1.14.0 (#f3859fd). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

@uhafner uhafner marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2025 18:51
If there are several items, it makes sense to provide a
subsection for these items.
Copy link

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 99% successful (❌ 1 failed, ✔️ 167 passed)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 87% (164 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 84% (54 missed branches)
   CheckStyle   CheckStyle: No warnings
   PMD   PMD: No warnings
   SpotBugs   SpotBugs: No bugs
   🌀   Cyclomatic Complexity: 524 (total)
   💭   Cognitive Complexity: 194 (total)
   📏   Lines of Code: 4545 (total)
   📝   Non Commenting Source Statements: 1679 (total)
   🔭   Access to foreign data: 274 (total)
   🔗   Class cohesion: 100.00% (maximum)
   📤   Fan out: 551 (total)
   📲   Number of accessors: 53 (total)
   ⚖️   Weight of a class: 100.00% (maximum)
   📐   Weighted method count: 600 (total)
   ➿   N-Path Complexity: 892 (total)


Created by Quality Monitor v1.14.0 (#f3859fd). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

The order of the returned files depends on the JDK implementation.
So it makes sense to ignore.
Copy link

☀️   Quality Monitor

   🚦   Tests: 99% successful (❌ 1 failed, ✔️ 167 passed)
   〰️   Line Coverage: 87% (165 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 84% (54 missed branches)
   CheckStyle   CheckStyle: No warnings
   PMD   PMD: 1 warning (normal: 1)
   SpotBugs   SpotBugs: No bugs
   🌀   Cyclomatic Complexity: 528 (total)
   💭   Cognitive Complexity: 196 (total)
   📏   Lines of Code: 4589 (total)
   📝   Non Commenting Source Statements: 1681 (total)
   🔭   Access to foreign data: 274 (total)
   🔗   Class cohesion: 100.00% (maximum)
   📤   Fan out: 549 (total)
   📲   Number of accessors: 53 (total)
   ⚖️   Weight of a class: 100.00% (maximum)
   📐   Weighted method count: 604 (total)
   ➿   N-Path Complexity: 896 (total)


Created by Quality Monitor v1.14.0 (#f3859fd). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

@uhafner uhafner merged commit c6f1729 into main Feb 26, 2025
7 of 13 checks passed
@uhafner uhafner deleted the refactor-tool-model branch February 26, 2025 07:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant