Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/update dependencies 20250115 #255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

w3nl
Copy link
Contributor

@w3nl w3nl commented Jan 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Version Update

    • Package version upgraded from 1.2.5 to 1.6.1
  • Node.js Compatibility

    • Updated Node.js engine requirement to version 20 and above
    • Updated Node.js testing matrix to include versions 20.x, 22.x, and 23.x
  • Dependencies

    • Updated helmet to version 8.0.0
    • Updated @types/node to version 22.0.0
    • Added new ESLint-related dependencies
  • API Improvements

    • Added unauthorized access handler for enhanced error management
    • Introduced optional mock parameter in parameter parsing
    • Updated OpenAPI specification with more detailed endpoint definitions
  • Code Quality

    • Refined ESLint configuration for improved code consistency
    • Removed deprecated configuration files
    • Simplified linting and code style rules

@w3nl w3nl requested a review from Copilot January 15, 2025 15:28
@w3nl w3nl self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several significant updates to the project's configuration, dependencies, and code structure. The changes focus on modernizing the development environment, updating Node.js versions, enhancing ESLint configuration, and introducing a new unauthorized handler for API requests. The modifications span across multiple files, including package management, workflow configurations, linting rules, and API handling, with an emphasis on improving code quality and consistency.

Changes

File Change Summary
.eslintrc Deleted configuration file
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated Node.js version matrix (removed 18.x and 21.x)
.nvmrc Updated Node.js version from 20.17.0 to 22.13.0
README.md Added unauthorizedHandler for API configuration
eslint.config.js New comprehensive ESLint configuration with multiple plugins
package.json Updated version, dependencies, and engine requirements
src/__fixtures__/spec.js Enhanced OpenAPI specification with detailed parameters
src/api.js Removed secret, added unauthorizedHandler
src/express-callback.js Added optional mock parameter
src/params.js Added optional mock parameter to parseParams
src/router.js Updated setupRouter with new parameters
src/server.js Added maximumBodySize parameter

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API
    participant UnauthorizedHandler
    participant Router
    participant Controller

    Client->>API: Send Request
    API->>Router: Route Request
    Router->>UnauthorizedHandler: Check Authorization
    alt Unauthorized
        UnauthorizedHandler-->>Client: Return 401 Response
    else Authorized
        Router->>Controller: Process Request
        Controller-->>Client: Return Response
    end
Loading

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, code's on the move,
Linting rules with a fresh groove,
Node versions leap so high and bright,
Unauthorized handlers set things right,
CodeRabbit's magic makes dev's delight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acc12be and 005ed0e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
  • .eslintrc (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • .nvmrc (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
  • package.json (5 hunks)
  • src/__fixtures__/spec.js (1 hunks)
  • src/api.js (3 hunks)
  • src/error-status.js (2 hunks)
  • src/error-status.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/express-callback.js (3 hunks)
  • src/express-callback.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/handlers/not-found.js (1 hunks)
  • src/handlers/request-validation.js (1 hunks)
  • src/handlers/response-validation.js (1 hunks)
  • src/handlers/unauthorized.js (1 hunks)
  • src/openapi.js (2 hunks)
  • src/operation-ids.js (2 hunks)
  • src/params.js (1 hunks)
  • src/params.test.js (9 hunks)
  • src/router.js (4 hunks)
  • src/router.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/server-no-auth.test.js (2 hunks)
  • src/server.js (4 hunks)
  • src/server.test.js (2 hunks)
  • src/types.js (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .eslintrc
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (12)
  • src/handlers/unauthorized.js
  • .nvmrc
  • src/handlers/request-validation.js
  • src/operation-ids.js
  • src/handlers/response-validation.js
  • src/error-status.test.js
  • src/openapi.js
  • src/router.test.js
  • src/express-callback.test.js
  • src/server-no-auth.test.js
  • src/handlers/not-found.js
  • src/error-status.js
🔇 Additional comments (16)
eslint.config.js (2)

36-44: Ensure all plugins are correctly referenced and configured

In the plugins section, all imported plugins are listed. Verify that each plugin is properly configured and that their associated rules are correctly applied. This includes ensuring that plugins like stylistic, jsdoc, and sonarjs have their configurations enabled.


216-217: Align Prettier and ESLint formatting rules for semicolons

You have set 'stylistic/semi': ['error', 'never'] to enforce no semicolons. Since you're using Prettier, ensure that its configuration aligns with this rule to prevent conflicts between ESLint and Prettier formatting.

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

11-11: Update Node.js version matrix with consideration

You've updated the Node.js version matrix to include 20.x, 22.x, and 23.x, removing 18.x and 21.x. Ensure that this aligns with your project's Node.js version support policy.

If your package.json specifies "node": ">= 20", removing versions below 20.x makes sense. However, including 23.x may introduce instability if it's not an LTS version. Confirm that Node.js 23.x is stable and supported for your project.

package.json (2)

36-49: Verify compatibility of updated ESLint dependencies

New dependencies like @eslint/js, @stylistic/eslint-plugin, and @stylistic/eslint-plugin-js have been added, and existing ones updated. Ensure that all ESLint plugins and configurations are compatible with ESLint version ^9.15.0 and that there are no conflicting rules.


60-60: Consider the impact of updating Node.js engine requirement

The engines field has been updated to "node": ">= 20". This change may exclude users who are on Node.js versions below 20. Confirm that this is intentional and that it aligns with your project's support policy.

src/params.js (2)

8-8: LGTM! Good enhancement to support mock values.

The addition of the mock parameter with example value support is a good improvement that maintains backward compatibility.

Also applies to: 11-11, 27-29


23-25: Verify test coverage for the new mock functionality.

Please ensure there are comprehensive test cases covering:

  • Mock parameter with example values
  • Mock parameter without example values
  • Default behavior when mock is false

Run this script to check test coverage:

Also applies to: 31-32

✅ Verification successful

Test coverage for mock functionality is comprehensive

The test suite includes all necessary test cases:

  • Mock enabled with example values
  • Mock disabled (default behavior)
  • Edge cases with undefined queries
  • Various parameter types and default values
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for mock functionality in params.test.js

# Test: Search for test cases covering mock functionality
rg -A 5 'mock.*true|mock.*false' 'src/params.test.js'

Length of output: 235


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get complete content of the test file
cat src/params.test.js

Length of output: 5542

src/express-callback.js (1)

19-19: LGTM! Good propagation of mock parameter.

The mock parameter is properly propagated to parseParams while maintaining backward compatibility.

Also applies to: 23-23, 38-42

src/api.js (3)

26-26: LGTM! Good addition of the unauthorized handler.

The addition of unauthorizedHandler to the ApiSchema typedef is well-documented and follows the existing pattern.


53-53: LGTM! Constructor parameter handling is correct.

The unauthorizedHandler is properly initialized with a fallback to undefined.

Also applies to: 67-67


98-99: LGTM! Proper integration with router setup.

The unauthorizedHandler is correctly passed to the setupRouter function.

src/server.js (2)

69-69: LGTM! Good addition of request size limiting.

The maximumBodySize parameter is properly documented in JSDoc and initialized with a sensible default.

Also applies to: 80-80


106-106: Verify the consistency of body size limits.

The maximumBodySize is applied to both express.json() and bodyParser.urlencoded(). Ensure this is intentional and that both middleware components need the same limit.

Also applies to: 108-108

✅ Verification successful

The body size limits are correctly configured

Both middleware components intentionally use the same maximumBodySize parameter, which is a good practice for maintaining consistent request handling. When not specified, both fall back to the same default limit of '100kb'.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any existing body size configurations in the codebase
rg -i 'limit|bodyparser|express.json' --type js

Length of output: 262


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find where maximumBodySize is defined
rg -A 2 "maximumBodySize" --type js

Length of output: 631

src/params.test.js (2)

Line range hint 75-90: LGTM! Good test coverage for non-mocked behavior.

The test case properly verifies that example values are not used when mock is not enabled.


91-110: LGTM! Good test coverage for mocked behavior.

The test case properly verifies that example values are used when mock is enabled.

src/server.test.js (1)

58-65: LGTM! Good security handler implementation.

The security handlers are well-structured and properly handle both API key and custom authentication methods.

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@w3nl w3nl changed the base branch from main to v1.x January 15, 2025 15:28

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 17 out of 27 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (10)
  • .eslintrc: Language not supported
  • .nvmrc: Language not supported
  • package.json: Language not supported
  • src/operation-ids.js: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/error-status.js: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/openapi.js: Evaluated as low risk
  • .github/workflows/test.yml: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/api.js: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/router.js: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/express-callback.test.js: Evaluated as low risk
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
eslint.config.js (3)

16-16: Consider enabling the Stylistic Plugin's recommended configuration

The line // stylisticPlugin.configs['recommended-flat'], is commented out. Enabling the Stylistic Plugin's recommended configuration can help enforce consistent code styling across your project.

Apply this diff to include the Stylistic Plugin's recommended configuration:

-// stylisticPlugin.configs['recommended-flat'],
+stylisticPlugin.configs['recommended-flat'],

22-22: Consider enabling the SonarJS recommended rules

The line // sonarjsPlugin.configs.recommended, is commented out. The SonarJS plugin provides rules that help detect bugs and code smells. Including this configuration can enhance code quality by catching potential issues early.

Apply this diff to include the SonarJS recommended configuration:

-// sonarjsPlugin.configs.recommended,
+sonarjsPlugin.configs.recommended,

220-256: Review import rules and extension settings

The import/extensions rule specifies that .js files must always include the extension. This might cause issues if you're importing modules without extensions or working with TypeScript files. Ensure that this rule aligns with your project's import style and module resolution.

Consider adjusting the rule as follows if you want to allow imports without extensions:

-'import/extensions': [
-    'error',
-    'ignorePackages',
-    {
-        js: 'always'
-    }
-],
+'import/extensions': [
+    'error',
+    'ignorePackages',
+    {
+        js: 'never',
+        ts: 'never',
+        jsx: 'never',
+        tsx: 'never'
+    }
+],
package.json (1)

4-4: Bump version number following semantic versioning

The version has been updated from "1.2.5" to "1.6.1". Ensure that the changes introduced justify this version increment according to semantic versioning principles.

src/router.js (1)

84-86: Consider destructuring in a more readable way.

The destructuring of mockResponseForOperation result could be more readable.

-        const { mock: mockImplementation } =
-            context.api.mockResponseForOperation(context.operation.operationId)
-        return mockImplementation
+        const { mock: mockResponse } = context.api.mockResponseForOperation(
+            context.operation.operationId
+        )
+        return mockResponse
src/express-callback.js (1)

67-71: Consider enhancing error logging.

The error logging could be more informative by including additional context.

-                if (errorCodeStatus >= 500) {
-                    logger.error(error)
-                } else {
-                    logger.warn(error)
-                }
+                const logContext = {
+                    url: request.originalUrl,
+                    method: request.method,
+                    errorCode: errorCodeStatus,
+                    errorType: error.constructor.name
+                }
+                if (errorCodeStatus >= 500) {
+                    logger.error(error, logContext)
+                } else {
+                    logger.warn(error, logContext)
+                }
src/server.test.js (1)

68-75: Consider adding more context to the unauthorized message.

While the unauthorizedHandler implementation is correct, consider enhancing the error message to provide more context about why the request was unauthorized.

 const unauthorizedHandler = async (_context, _request, response) => {
     response.status(403)
     return {
         status: 403,
         timestamp: new Date(),
-        message: 'Unauthorized'
+        message: 'Unauthorized: Missing or invalid authentication credentials'
     }
 }
src/__fixtures__/spec.js (3)

59-61: Enhance the 401 response schema.

The 401 response should include a schema to document the error response structure that matches the unauthorizedHandler implementation.

-        description: 'Unauthorized'
+        description: 'Unauthorized - Invalid or missing API key',
+        content: {
+            'application/json': {
+                schema: {
+                    type: 'object',
+                    properties: {
+                        status: {
+                            type: 'integer',
+                            example: 401
+                        },
+                        timestamp: {
+                            type: 'string',
+                            format: 'date-time'
+                        },
+                        message: {
+                            type: 'string',
+                            example: 'Unauthorized'
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+        }
     }

78-79: Add pagination parameters to /users endpoint.

For consistency with the /messages endpoint, consider adding the same pagination parameters to the /users endpoint.

     parameters: [
+        {
+            name: 'size',
+            required: false,
+            in: 'query',
+            schema: {
+                type: 'integer',
+                minimum: 1,
+                maximum: 10000,
+                example: 10,
+                default: 10
+            }
+        },
+        {
+            name: 'page',
+            required: false,
+            in: 'query',
+            schema: {
+                type: 'integer',
+                minimum: 0,
+                example: 0,
+                default: 0
+            }
+        }
     ],

147-151: Update cursor URLs to use dynamic path.

The cursor examples hardcode /message but should use a dynamic path that matches the current endpoint.

     example: {
-        self: 'http://localhost:3000/message?page=2&size=10',
-        prev: 'http://localhost:3000/message?page=1&size=10',
-        next: 'http://localhost:3000/message?page=3&size=10',
-        first: 'http://localhost:3000/message?page=0&size=10',
-        last: 'http://localhost:3000/message?page=4&size=10'
+        self: 'http://localhost:3000/{path}?page=2&size=10',
+        prev: 'http://localhost:3000/{path}?page=1&size=10',
+        next: 'http://localhost:3000/{path}?page=3&size=10',
+        first: 'http://localhost:3000/{path}?page=0&size=10',
+        last: 'http://localhost:3000/{path}?page=4&size=10'
     },
README.md (2)

95-102: Enhance unauthorizedHandler implementation.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add JSDoc for better type documentation
  2. Follow error handling best practices
+/**
+ * Handles unauthorized access attempts
+ * @param {Object} context - The context object
+ * @param {Object} request - The request object
+ * @param {Object} response - The response object
+ * @returns {Promise<Object>} The error response object
+ */
 const unauthorizedHandler = async (context, request, response) => {
+    const errorResponse = {
+        status: 401,
+        timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+        message: 'Unauthorized'
+    }
     response.status(401)
-    return {
-        status: 401,
-        timestamp: new Date(),
-        message: 'Unauthorized'
-    }
+    return errorResponse
 }

108-109: Consider documenting the unauthorizedHandler in the API configuration section.

Add a comment explaining the purpose of the unauthorizedHandler in the API configuration.

 const api = new Api({
   version: 'v1',
   specification: openAPISpecification,
   controllers,
   securityHandlers,
+  // Handler for unauthorized access attempts (returns 401 response)
   unauthorizedHandler
 })
🛑 Comments failed to post (5)
package.json (3)

74-74: ⚠️ Potential issue

Review major version upgrade of 'helmet' for breaking changes

The helmet package has been updated from ^7.0.0 to ^8.0.0. Major version changes can introduce breaking changes. Review the helmet release notes to ensure compatibility and update your code if necessary.


85-85: ⚠️ Potential issue

Assess the necessity and security implications of 'cookie' override

An override has been added for "cookie@<=0.7.0": "0.7.0". Pinning the cookie package to a specific version may prevent important security updates. Ensure that this override is necessary and consider potential security risks.


11-13: ⚠️ Potential issue

Specify target files for ESLint scripts

The lint and lint:fix scripts no longer specify target files or directories. This may cause ESLint to lint unintended files or skip necessary ones. It's advisable to specify the target directories to ensure consistent linting.

Apply this diff to specify the src directory:

-"lint": "eslint",
-"lint:fix": "eslint --fix",
+"lint": "eslint src",
+"lint:fix": "eslint src --fix",
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        "lint": "eslint src",
        "lint:report": "eslint src/*.js -f json -o report.json",
        "lint:fix": "eslint src --fix",
src/router.js (1)

13-13: 💡 Codebase verification

Documentation missing for new router parameters

The README shows usage of unauthorizedHandler in code examples but lacks proper documentation explaining its purpose and configuration. The mock parameter is completely undocumented. Both parameters should be documented with:

  • Parameter descriptions
  • Configuration options
  • Usage examples
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Good enhancement to support custom unauthorized handling and mock responses.

The addition of unauthorizedHandler and mock parameters with proper defaults maintains backward compatibility while adding useful customization options.

Please ensure these new parameters are documented in the README. Run this script to check:

Also applies to: 28-28, 30-30, 42-42, 44-44

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if new parameters are documented in README

# Test: Search for documentation of new parameters
rg -i 'unauthorizedHandler|mock.*parameter' 'README.md'

Length of output: 145


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get broader context of router documentation
rg -i -B2 -A5 'router|middleware' 'README.md'

# Also check for any API or configuration documentation sections
rg -i -B1 -A1 '## (api|configuration|usage)' 'README.md'

Length of output: 102


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all markdown files in the repository
fd -e md

# If README exists, get its content to verify structure
if [ -f "README.md" ]; then
    head -n 20 README.md
fi

Length of output: 2067


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get full README content
cat README.md

Length of output: 4206

src/server.test.js (1)

124-138: 💡 Codebase verification

Status code 403 is incorrectly used for missing authentication

The change from 401 to 403 is problematic because:

  • HTTP 401 is the correct status code for missing authentication credentials
  • HTTP 403 implies the client is authenticated but lacks permissions
  • Other parts of the codebase correctly use 401 for unauthorized access

The status code should remain 401 to maintain:

  • Consistency with HTTP standards
  • Alignment with the existing unauthorized.js handler
  • Semantic accuracy (403 with 'Unauthorized' message is contradictory)
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the status code change from 401 to 403.

The change from 401 to 403 status code should be verified against API standards. Typically:

  • 401 means "Unauthorized" (missing credentials)
  • 403 means "Forbidden" (insufficient permissions)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining instances of 401 status codes
rg -A 2 -B 2 'status.*401|401.*status' --type js

# Check for consistency in error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'response.status($status)' 

Length of output: 726

@w3nl w3nl merged commit 2914187 into v1.x Jan 15, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants