Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add syntax error check to lint-and-test #964

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

szepeviktor
Copy link
Contributor

Let's see those syntax errors.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.07%. Comparing base (58f299f) to head (40363f8).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #964   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.07%   94.07%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         641      641           
  Branches       39       39           
=======================================
  Hits          603      603           
  Misses         38       38           
Flag Coverage Δ
default 91.79% <ø> (ø)
js 100.00% <ø> (ø)
multisite 91.79% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@szepeviktor
Copy link
Contributor Author

No syntax errors :(

@swissspidy swissspidy added this to the 2.2.2 milestone Feb 26, 2024
@swissspidy swissspidy merged commit 676cc26 into swissspidy:main Feb 26, 2024
26 checks passed
@szepeviktor szepeviktor deleted the patch-1 branch February 26, 2024 16:16
@szepeviktor
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was hoping for finding a single puny syntax error ...

@swissspidy
Copy link
Owner

Sorry to disappoint :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants