Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support lenient parsing for dates using AM/PM in conjunction with @DateTimeFormat #30649

Closed
sbrannen opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Support lenient parsing for dates using AM/PM in conjunction with @DateTimeFormat #30649

sbrannen opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
@sbrannen
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) status: superseded An issue that has been superseded by another

Comments

@sbrannen
Copy link
Member

sbrannen commented Jun 12, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Overview

This is a follow-up to #30185 and #33151.

When applications run on JDK 23+, Spring Framework should support lenient parsing for date/time formats that include the time period (AM or PM) -- for example, by matching leniently against a narrow non-breaking space (NNBSP) or a standard space between the hour and AM/PM declaration.

Related Resources

Related Issues
@sbrannen sbrannen added in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Jun 12, 2023
@sbrannen sbrannen added this to the 6.1.x milestone Jun 12, 2023
@sbrannen sbrannen mentioned this issue Jun 12, 2023
Closed
@bclozel bclozel mentioned this issue Jun 27, 2023
Closed
@bclozel bclozel modified the milestones: 6.1.x, 6.2.x Dec 18, 2023
@bclozel bclozel changed the title Support lenient parsing for dates using AM/PM in conjunction with @DateTimeFormat Support lenient parsing for dates using AM/PM in conjunction with @DateTimeFormat Feb 14, 2024
@sormuras
Copy link

"Loose matching of space separators in the lenient date/time parsing mode" has been integrated into Java 23-ea+9:

See JDK-8324665 for more details.

@snicoll snicoll mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2024
Closed
@snicoll snicoll modified the milestones: 6.2.x, 6.1.x Jul 4, 2024
@snicoll

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@snicoll snicoll added type: task A general task and removed type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Jul 4, 2024
@snicoll

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@snicoll snicoll mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2024
Closed
@snicoll snicoll added type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed type: task A general task labels Jul 4, 2024
@snicoll snicoll modified the milestones: 6.1.x, 6.2.x Jul 4, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen changed the title Support lenient parsing for dates using AM/PM in conjunction with @DateTimeFormat Support lenient parsing for dates using AM/PM in conjunction with @DateTimeFormat Jul 4, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen modified the milestones: 6.2.x, 6.2.0-M5 Jul 4, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen self-assigned this Jul 4, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen mentioned this issue Jul 5, 2024
Closed
sbrannen added a commit to sbrannen/spring-framework that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2024
@sbrannen
Support lenient Date/Time parsing with @⁠DateTimeFormat
ad069a9 
Closes spring-projectsgh-30649
@sbrannen sbrannen modified the milestones: 6.2.0-M5, 6.2.x Jul 10, 2024
@rayman245 rayman245 mentioned this issue Sep 24, 2024
Closed
@sbrannen sbrannen added type: documentation A documentation task and removed type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Oct 1, 2024
@sbrannen
Copy link
Member Author

After experimenting with the available options in this feature branch, we decided not to provide built-in support for lenient parsing of date/time formats in conjunction with @DateTimeFormat.

Instead, we will document the options that Spring users have, and I am therefore closing this as superseded by:

@sbrannen sbrannen closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 19, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen added status: superseded An issue that has been superseded by another and removed type: documentation A documentation task labels Oct 19, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen removed this from the 6.2.x milestone Oct 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sbrannen sbrannen

Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) status: superseded An issue that has been superseded by another
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@bclozel @sbrannen @snicoll @sormuras