-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 7 pull requests #93621
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 7 pull requests #93621
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Compiler panics should be rare - when they do occur, we want the report filed by the user to contain as much information as possible. This is especially important when the panic is due to an incremental compilation bug, since we may not have enough information to reproduce it. This PR sets `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` inside `rustc` if the user has not explicitly set `RUST_BACKTRACE`. This is more verbose than `RUST_BACKTRACE=1`, but this may make it easier to debug incremental compilation issues. Users who find this too verbose can still manually set `RUST_BACKTRACE` before invoking the compiler. This only affects `rustc` (and any tool using `rustc_driver::install_ice_hook`). It does *not* affect any user crates or the standard library - backtraces will continue to be off by default in any application *compiled* by rustc.
rustdoc: Fix ICE report The ICE report in rustdoc was confusing because it was returning an argument parse error: ``` thread 'rustc' panicked at 'aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`', compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1212:27 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic error: Unrecognized option: 'crate-version' ``` This is because the ICE reporter was trying to parse the arguments as rustc, not rustdoc. Since an argument error is a fatal error, it was early-exiting with the argument error due to unwinding. This changes it to be a more primitive scan of the arguments. The arguments being checked are pretty simple, and only have a small handful of forms that are easy to check for. It now looks like this: ``` thread 'rustc' panicked at 'aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`', compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1212:27 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug. note: we would appreciate a bug report: /~https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/new?labels=C-bug%2C+I-ICE%2C+T-compiler&template=ice.md note: rustc 1.59.0-dev running on x86_64-apple-darwin note: compiler flags: --crate-type lib -Z treat-err-as-bug note: some of the compiler flags provided by cargo are hidden query stack during panic: end of query stack ``` It still says `rustc`, but I can live with that.
…race, r=oli-obk Deduplicate lines in long const-eval stack trace Lemme know if this is kinda overkill, lol. Fixes rust-lang#92796
Factor convenience functions out of main printer implementation The pretty printer in rustc_ast_pretty has a section of methods commented "Convenience functions to talk to the printer". This PR pulls those out to a separate module. This leaves pp.rs with only the minimal API that is core to the pretty printing algorithm. I found this separation to be helpful in /~https://github.com/dtolnay/prettyplease because it makes clear when changes are adding some fundamental new capability to the pretty printer algorithm vs just making it more convenient to call some already existing functionality.
Make rustc use `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` by default Compiler panics should be rare - when they do occur, we want the report filed by the user to contain as much information as possible. This is especially important when the panic is due to an incremental compilation bug, since we may not have enough information to reproduce it. This PR sets `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` inside `rustc` if the user has not explicitly set `RUST_BACKTRACE`. This is more verbose than `RUST_BACKTRACE=1`, but this may make it easier to debug incremental compilation issues. Users who find this too verbose can still manually set `RUST_BACKTRACE` before invoking the compiler. This only affects `rustc` (and any tool using `rustc_driver::install_ice_hook`). It does *not* affect any user crates or the standard library - backtraces will continue to be off by default in any application *compiled* by rustc.
Use Option::then in two places
…r=yaahc fix: Remove extra newlines from junit output This PR fixes extra newline in junit output rust-lang#93454
…r, r=oli-obk Correct incorrect description of preorder traversals The internal documentation for the `Preorder` type gave an incorrect description (the description is not even correct for the example provided, since C is visited after one of its successors). This corrects the description, and adds in a sentence explaining more precisely how the traversals are performed.
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Feb 3, 2022
@bors r+ p=7 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 38adea9 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Feb 3, 2022
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (4e8fb74): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
RUST_BACKTRACE=full
by default #93566 (Make rustc useRUST_BACKTRACE=full
by default)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup