Switch query descriptions to just String

[Mark-Simulacrum]

In practice we never used the borrowed variant anyway.

[rust-highfive]

r? @davidtwco

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit f564d7a with merge ec1a063060c724397e9201b90955b36831056a3f...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: ec1a063060c724397e9201b90955b36831056a3f (ec1a063060c724397e9201b90955b36831056a3f)

[rust-timer]

Queued ec1a063060c724397e9201b90955b36831056a3f with parent 921ec4b, future comparison URL.

[jackh726]

r? @jackh726

r=me if perf is good or neutral

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking try commit (ec1a063060c724397e9201b90955b36831056a3f): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r=jackh726

[bors]

📌 Commit f564d7a has been approved by jackh726

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit f564d7a with merge 36931ce...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jackh726
Pushing 36931ce to master...