-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unit-like structs doc: Improve code sample #40144
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
@bors: r+ rollup thanks! (not sure what's up with travis) |
📌 Commit 3c5001f has been approved by |
Unit-like structs doc: Improve code sample r? @steveklabnik BTW it seems that ```Rust let p = Proton {}; ``` compiles without an error. That's why I didn't add it to the example. It's about consistency anyway.
@bors r- This results in a doctest error: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.2166/job/mh1vjrnly4lrqgty |
Can examples in the book be marked compile-fail? Otherwise that code block will need to be ignored, or the error demonstration line commented out. |
I think so: /~https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustdoc/html/markdown.rs#L541-L562 |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 8f1a0af has been approved by |
Unit-like structs doc: Improve code sample r? @steveklabnik BTW it seems that ```Rust let p = Proton {}; ``` compiles without an error. That's why I didn't add it to the example. It's about consistency anyway.
r? @steveklabnik
BTW it seems that
compiles without an error. That's why I didn't add it to the example. It's about consistency anyway.