Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Register new snapshots #30352

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2015
Merged

Register new snapshots #30352

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2015

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Lots of cruft to remove!

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

r? @nikomatsakis

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned nikomatsakis and unassigned aturon Dec 12, 2015
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

(or anyone else)

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Dec 12, 2015

This version has a performance regression DO NOT SNAPSHOT UNTIL IT IS FIXED!

vtable: vtable
})
}
pub fn cstore_to_cratestore(a: Rc<CStore>) -> Rc<for<'s> CrateStore<'s>> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just kill the function. it has no reason for existing.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@arielb1 oh hm, is there an issue for that? Depending on how much the snapshot is desired it may be worth making a snapshot before the regression (or just going ahead if the regression isn't that bad anyway)

@dotdash
Copy link
Contributor

dotdash commented Dec 12, 2015

@alexcrichton I guess this might be about #30242 which apparently introduced a perf regression. There's no issue for that yet AFAICT.

@@ -197,7 +195,6 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> !marker::Send for Rc<T> {}
impl<T: ?Sized> !marker::Sync for Rc<T> {}

// remove cfg after new snapshot
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment should be removed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, it indeed can

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

I think that #30368 is @arielb1 's PR to address the performance regression.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 18, 2015

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #30457) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased and updated with new snapshots that include #30368

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ p=1

Travis has been kind of flaky lately, eh? Is there a reason for that?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2015

📌 Commit afa656a has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2015

⌛ Testing commit afa656a with merge 9bffee0...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-win-gnu-32-opt

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=nikomatsakis 34a75ea7abc6472498e91f7e7f2d7484429b7aa9

Actually travis seems to be pretty reliable for me at least as that's a test I needed to fix!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 34a75ea with merge 14cea44...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 20, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-nopt-t

Lots of cruft to remove!
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=nikomatsakis cd1848a

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2015

⌛ Testing commit cd1848a with merge 0c158e7...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-mac-32-opt

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:11 AM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - auto-mac-32-opt
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-mac-32-opt/builds/7529


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#30352 (comment).

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2015
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 21, 2015

⌛ Testing commit cd1848a with merge 2343a92...

@bors bors merged commit cd1848a into rust-lang:master Dec 21, 2015
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the new-snashots branch December 22, 2015 05:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants