-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Register new snapshots #30352
Register new snapshots #30352
Conversation
r? @aturon (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
(or anyone else) |
This version has a performance regression DO NOT SNAPSHOT UNTIL IT IS FIXED! |
vtable: vtable | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
pub fn cstore_to_cratestore(a: Rc<CStore>) -> Rc<for<'s> CrateStore<'s>> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just kill the function. it has no reason for existing.
a4a212c
to
bbab661
Compare
@arielb1 oh hm, is there an issue for that? Depending on how much the snapshot is desired it may be worth making a snapshot before the regression (or just going ahead if the regression isn't that bad anyway) |
@alexcrichton I guess this might be about #30242 which apparently introduced a perf regression. There's no issue for that yet AFAICT. |
@@ -197,7 +195,6 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> !marker::Send for Rc<T> {} | |||
impl<T: ?Sized> !marker::Sync for Rc<T> {} | |||
|
|||
// remove cfg after new snapshot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment should be removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops, it indeed can
bbab661
to
0e8ac4f
Compare
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #30457) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
0e8ac4f
to
f17e67e
Compare
Rebased and updated with new snapshots that include #30368 |
f17e67e
to
afa656a
Compare
@bors r+ p=1 Travis has been kind of flaky lately, eh? Is there a reason for that? |
📌 Commit afa656a has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit afa656a with merge 9bffee0... |
💔 Test failed - auto-win-gnu-32-opt |
@bors: retry |
afa656a
to
34a75ea
Compare
@bors: r=nikomatsakis 34a75ea7abc6472498e91f7e7f2d7484429b7aa9 Actually travis seems to be pretty reliable for me at least as that's a test I needed to fix! |
⌛ Testing commit 34a75ea with merge 14cea44... |
💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-nopt-t |
Lots of cruft to remove!
34a75ea
to
cd1848a
Compare
⌛ Testing commit cd1848a with merge 0c158e7... |
💔 Test failed - auto-mac-32-opt |
@bors: retry On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:11 AM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Lots of cruft to remove!