Rollup of 3 pull requests #125233
Merged
Rollup of 3 pull requests #125233
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Migrate `run-make/static-unwinding` to `rmake` Part of rust-lang#121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html). An easy one after the last one, though the explanatory comment could use some clarification.
…jieyouxu Migrate `run-make/issue64319` to `rmake` and rename Part of rust-lang#121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html). ~~I noticed that the Makefile was not listed in `allowed-run-makefiles` in Tidy. Does this mean the test was being ignored?~~ EDIT: No, it was there, just not in its expected alphabetical order. EDIT2: Perhaps it could be interesting to clean this test visually by looping over the `rustc` calls, like in rust-lang#125227.
Migrate `run-make/issue-28766` to `rmake` Part of rust-lang#121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 9b75a43881 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (8e78d16): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -2.5%, secondary 4.6%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary -0.8%, secondary -2.9%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 668.325s -> 668.38s (0.01%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
run-make/static-unwindingtormake#125213 (Migraterun-make/static-unwindingtormake)run-make/issue64319tormakeand rename #125215 (Migraterun-make/issue64319tormakeand rename)run-make/issue-28766tormake#125221 (Migraterun-make/issue-28766tormake)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup