Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(RHEL-35890) feat(lsinitrd.sh): look for initrd in /usr/lib/modules/ #93

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

pvalena
Copy link
Contributor

@pvalena pvalena commented Aug 16, 2024

Introduce new path for lsinitrd.sh to look into:

/usr/lib/modules/$kver/initramfs.img

Which is valid on all ostree-based systems, and also other image based
systems with pre-generated initramfs.

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-35890

(cherry picked from commit 7c7cdd9317c21b19a0393f5d28d1acb7ee3ff027 from PR#582)

Resolves: RHEL-35890

Introduce new path for lsinitrd.sh to look into:

/usr/lib/modules/$kver/initramfs.img

Which is valid on all ostree-based systems, and also other image based
systems with pre-generated initramfs.

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-35890

(cherry picked from commit 7c7cdd9317c21b19a0393f5d28d1acb7ee3ff027 from PR#582)

Resolves: RHEL-35890
@pvalena pvalena added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 16, 2024
@pvalena pvalena self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@pvalena pvalena marked this pull request as draft August 16, 2024 19:13
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title feat(lsinitrd.sh): look for initrd in /usr/lib/modules/ (RHEL-35890) feat(lsinitrd.sh): look for initrd in /usr/lib/modules/ Aug 16, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Commit validation

Tracker - RHEL-35890

The following commits need an inspection

commit note
0110f7a - feat(lsinitrd.sh): look for initrd in /usr/lib/modules/ Missing upstream reference ‼️

Tracker validation

Failed

🔴 Tracker RHEL-35890 has not been approved

Success

🟢 Tracker RHEL-35890 has set desired product: rhel-9.4
🟢 Tracker RHEL-35890 has set desired component: dracut

Tip

🔵 Jira is approved if it has set Fix Version/s


Pull Request validation

Failed

🔴 Failed or pending checks - testing-farm:centos-stream-9-x86_64[failure],test (fedora:latest, 41)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 40)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 36)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 35)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 31)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 30)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 17)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 14)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 13)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 12)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 11)[failure],test (fedora:latest, 10)[failure]
🔴 Review - Missing review from a member

@pvalena
Copy link
Contributor Author

pvalena commented Aug 19, 2024

LGTM, verified via upstream PR.

@pvalena pvalena marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2024 06:59
@pvalena pvalena merged commit b925190 into redhat-plumbers:main Aug 19, 2024
31 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant