Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ici reader tiepoints bugfix #2701

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

BengtRydberg
Copy link
Contributor

This small PR fixes how pixel positions are reconstructed from tiepoints for the ICI reader. The tiepoints are not evenly distributed around the scan end as was assumed earlier.

  • Tests added
  • Add your name to AUTHORS.md if not there already

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.39%. Comparing base (4c30838) to head (2aef549).
Report is 333 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2701   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.39%   95.39%           
=======================================
  Files         371      371           
  Lines       52683    52693   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits        50256    50266   +10     
  Misses       2427     2427           
Flag Coverage Δ
behaviourtests 4.16% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 96.00% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@mraspaud mraspaud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mraspaud mraspaud merged commit 384fa08 into pytroll:main Apr 17, 2024
16 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants