You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want tests to be generic, so we can test against different curves etc more easily.
We also don't want to introduce "regressions" w.r.t. code style for HyperNova work.
Context
From upstream PR review:
There were recent PRs (e.g., microsoft#171, microsoft#165) to make tests generic over the curves. I wonder if it makes sense to continue that approach to allow library users to switch curves and still run these tests more easily.
Problem
We want tests to be generic, so we can test against different curves etc more easily.
We also don't want to introduce "regressions" w.r.t. code style for HyperNova work.
Context
From upstream PR review:
Originally posted by @srinathsetty in microsoft#175 (comment)
Acceptance criteria
All newly introduced tests (w.r.t. upstream) are generic w.r.t. F or G.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: