Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pjlinkdevice] Fix authentication #11472

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2021

Conversation

nils
Copy link
Contributor

@nils nils commented Oct 30, 2021

Fixes authentication problems that have been reported by itseogo on the OpenHAB Community.

The problem was caused by an earlier compatibility fix that generally uppercased responses from the projector. This should not be done for the authentication nonce (which contains lowercase characters that have to be preserved).

The JAR should be available soon.
Here I guess (needs to be validated after the build).

@openhab-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request has been mentioned on openHAB Community. There might be relevant details there:

https://community.openhab.org/t/new-pjlink-binding-for-controlling-multiple-projector-brands-models/56608/51

Signed-off-by: Nils Schnabel <github@to.nilsschnabel.de>
@nils nils force-pushed the pjlink-authentication-fix branch from 6ef53df to ceaebbd Compare October 30, 2021 06:19
Copy link
Contributor

@lolodomo lolodomo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lolodomo lolodomo added additional testing preferred The change works for the pull request author. A test from someone else is preferred though. bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on labels Oct 30, 2021
@nils nils marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2021 06:24
@nils nils self-assigned this Oct 30, 2021
@lolodomo
Copy link
Contributor

@nils : do you prefer waiting for a user feedback or are you enough confident and I merge your change now?

@nils
Copy link
Contributor Author

nils commented Oct 31, 2021

@lolodomo I have confirmed and subsequently fixed the issue using the official PJLink test tool, so it seems to be fine to be merged right away.

By the way, do you know what's going on with the PR build artifacts? In the PR description template, there's a path on jfrog mentioned, but that pattern does not seem to work.

@lolodomo lolodomo merged commit 4423b16 into openhab:main Oct 31, 2021
@lolodomo lolodomo removed the additional testing preferred The change works for the pull request author. A test from someone else is preferred though. label Oct 31, 2021
@lolodomo lolodomo added this to the 3.2 milestone Oct 31, 2021
@nils nils deleted the pjlink-authentication-fix branch November 1, 2021 20:50
dschoepel pushed a commit to dschoepel/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
Signed-off-by: Nils Schnabel <github@to.nilsschnabel.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave J Schoepel <dave@theschoepels.com>
jpg0 pushed a commit to jpg0/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2021
Signed-off-by: Nils Schnabel <github@to.nilsschnabel.de>
@wborn wborn changed the title [pjlinkdevice] fix authentication [pjlinkdevice] Fix authentication Dec 18, 2021
NickWaterton pushed a commit to NickWaterton/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2021
Signed-off-by: Nils Schnabel <github@to.nilsschnabel.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Waterton <n.waterton@outlook.com>
nemerdaud pushed a commit to nemerdaud/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2022
Signed-off-by: Nils Schnabel <github@to.nilsschnabel.de>
marcfischerboschio pushed a commit to bosch-io/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request May 5, 2022
Signed-off-by: Nils Schnabel <github@to.nilsschnabel.de>
andan67 pushed a commit to andan67/openhab-addons that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2022
Signed-off-by: Nils Schnabel <github@to.nilsschnabel.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants