Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi transfer execute by user flag #6334

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 29, 2024

Conversation

sasurobert
Copy link
Contributor

Reasoning behind the pull request

Proposed changes

Testing procedure

Pre-requisites

Based on the Contributing Guidelines the PR author and the reviewers must check the following requirements are met:

  • was the PR targeted to the correct branch?
  • if this is a larger feature that probably needs more than one PR, is there a feat branch created?
  • if this is a feat branch merging, do all satellite projects have a proper tag inside go.mod?

sstanculeanu
sstanculeanu previously approved these changes Jul 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@gabi-vuls gabi-vuls left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Normal allin test: v1.7.13-dev-config-aebb55e8e0 -> multiTransfer_execute_by_u-28f517a3e3

--- Specific errors ---

block hash does not match 2210
wrong nonce in block 1072
miniblocks does not match 0
num miniblocks does not match 0
miniblock hash does not match 0
block bodies does not match 0
receipts hash missmatch 0

/------/

--- Statistics ---

Nr. of all ERRORS: 1
Nr. of all WARNS: 1743
Nr. of new ERRORS: 1
Nr. of new WARNS: 12
Nr. of PANICS: 0

/------/

@sstanculeanu sstanculeanu merged commit 552fbac into rc/v1.7.next1 Jul 29, 2024
8 checks passed
@sstanculeanu sstanculeanu deleted the multiTransfer_execute_by_user branch July 29, 2024 06:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants