Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure that the same version of PDF.js is used in both the API and the Viewer (PR 8959 follow-up) #12540

Merged

Conversation

Snuffleupagus
Copy link
Collaborator

Given that we're now accessing certain API-functionality directly in this file, e.g. the AnnotationStorage and Optional Content configuration, ensuring that there's not a version mismatch definitely seem like a good idea to prevent any subtle future bugs.

…e Viewer (PR 8959 follow-up)

Given that we're now accessing certain API-functionality *directly* in this file, e.g. the AnnotationStorage and Optional Content configuration, ensuring that there's not a version mismatch definitely seem like a good idea to prevent any *subtle* future bugs.
@Snuffleupagus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/botio-linux preview

@pdfjsbot
Copy link

From: Bot.io (Linux m4)


Received

Command cmd_preview from @Snuffleupagus received. Current queue size: 0

Live output at: http://54.67.70.0:8877/38b9f9866e52ef6/output.txt

@pdfjsbot
Copy link

From: Bot.io (Linux m4)


Success

Full output at http://54.67.70.0:8877/38b9f9866e52ef6/output.txt

Total script time: 4.07 mins

Published

@timvandermeij timvandermeij merged commit 6fae381 into mozilla:master Oct 27, 2020
@timvandermeij
Copy link
Contributor

Good idea!

@Snuffleupagus Snuffleupagus deleted the BaseViewer-version-check branch October 28, 2020 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants