-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(checker): libsolv checker #1562
Conversation
Welcome @rhythmrx9. Can you ensure your pull request conforms to the conventional commits format. |
Co-authored-by: Bread Genie <63963181+BreadGenie@users.noreply.github.com>
Thanks @anthonyharrison . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Enabled CI. Looks like you're failing the spelling check because of the new checker name going into the docs, so you'll need to add that.
Thanks, added. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one also has a conflict because of the checker table. (see #1582)
Since we don't have a resolution for that, maybe just update this one after your other one gets merged?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for persevering on all these checkers! This is still failing a CI check for the commit message (which will resolve when I squash the commits) and has a disk I/O error that seems unrelated to this code, so I'm going to go ahead and merge it now.
Co-authored-by: Bread Genie <63963181+BreadGenie@users.noreply.github.com>
closes #1491