-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
differences between v1 and v2 #70
Comments
@miek@miek.nl commented The hangindent "issue" seems to be caused by line 160 in xml2rfc 2.3.9 inxml2rfc/writers/raw_txt.py: 157 elif style == 'hanging': |
@henrik@levkowetz.com changed owner from |
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented Summary of differences, taken from the given link:
|
@henrik@levkowetz.com changed priority from |
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented From d7c7e99: Make in a hangindent list reset the indentation to the hang-indent, even if the bullet text is longer than the hang-indent. Addresses issue #70. |
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented From 98f4e12: Change spanx emphasis back to this instead of -this-, matching the v1 behaviour. Addresses issue #70. |
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented Checking the behaviour for hangindent lists, the current behaviour matches what's desired, in 2.3.11. |
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented Checking the various formatting specifications mentioned, %i, %C, (%d), now also work as expected (in 2.3.11) |
@henrik@levkowetz.com changed status from |
@henrik@levkowetz.com changed resolution from `` to |
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented Closed with commit d0ed0b2. |
owner:henrik@levkowetz.com
resolution_fixed
type_defect
| by miek@miek.nlPlease see this thread of the differences between xml2rfc 1.36 and xml2rfc 2.3.9.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc/current/msg03493.html
Issue migrated from trac:70 at 2022-02-05 12:26:12 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: