Alternative ways to get genomic positions #150
Merged
+4,416
−23
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Closed
…cnvpy into biomart-genomic-positions
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
grst
force-pushed
the
biomart-genomic-positions
branch
from
377eafe to
803453b
Compare
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
get_genomic_positio_from_biomartfunction and advertise it as the new defaultFix #145 -> this is also the infamous gtfparse issue
Fix #7 -> implement workaround for non-gencode GTFs; also biomart is anyway better
Fix #144 -> alternative way to get genomic positions