README wip

[danielchalef]

🚀	This description was created by Ellipsis for commit e4e579a

Summary:

The README.md file is updated to provide a comprehensive overview of the graphiti library, including features, installation, and usage examples, with placeholders for additional content.

Key points:

• Updated README.md to provide a detailed overview of the graphiti library.
• Added sections on features, use cases, and installation requirements.
• Included a quick start guide with example code for adding episodes and searching the graph.
• Explained data ingestion and graph search processes with examples.
• Highlighted unique capabilities of graphiti for temporally-aware knowledge graphs.
• Added placeholders for badges, videos, and roadmap.

---

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 4105cf2 in 18 seconds

More details

• Looked at 140 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 9 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. README.md:3

• Draft comment:
  The README contains several TODO placeholders (e.g., lines 3, 7, 11, 36, 130) that need to be completed to provide full information to the users.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The README contains several TODO placeholders that need to be addressed before it can be considered complete.

2. README.md:134

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding contribution guidelines to help users understand how they can contribute to the project.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The README should include a section on how to contribute to the project, which is currently missing.

3. README.md:136

• Draft comment:
  The 'Support' section is empty. Consider adding information on how users can get help or support for the project.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The support section is empty and should provide information on how users can get help or support.

4. README.md:3

• Draft comment:
  Replace 'TODO' with actual content or remove it if not needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The README contains placeholder text 'TODO' which should be replaced with actual content.

5. README.md:7

• Draft comment:
  Replace 'TODO' with actual content or remove it if not needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The README contains placeholder text 'TODO' which should be replaced with actual content.

6. README.md:11

• Draft comment:
  Replace 'TODO' with actual content or remove it if not needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The README contains placeholder text 'TODO' which should be replaced with actual content.

7. README.md:36

• Draft comment:
  Replace 'TODO' with actual content or remove it if not needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The README contains placeholder text 'TODO' which should be replaced with actual content.

8. README.md:130

• Draft comment:
  Replace 'TODO' with actual content or remove it if not needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The README contains placeholder text 'TODO' which should be replaced with actual content.

9. README.md:70

• Draft comment:
  Avoid using hardcoded credentials. Replace with a placeholder or environment variable.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is addressing a potential security issue, which is important. However, in the context of a README file, it's common to use hardcoded credentials as placeholders for demonstration purposes. The comment might not be necessary if the intention is clear that these are placeholders.
  I might be underestimating the importance of emphasizing security best practices, even in example code. However, the context of a README file often implies that these are not real credentials.
  While security is important, the context of a README file typically implies that the credentials are placeholders. It's more important to ensure that this is clear to the reader.
  The comment should be removed because the hardcoded credentials are likely placeholders in a README example, which is a common practice.

Workflow ID: wflow_PDVqt5TgVKfpZdfu

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to e4e579a in 11 seconds

More details

• Looked at 374 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 1 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. README.md:327

• Draft comment:
  Typo: 'endavour' should be 'endeavor'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 10%
  The README file contains a typo in the word 'endeavour'.

2. README.md:190

• Draft comment:
  Typo: 'Epsiode' should be 'Episode'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 10%
  The README file contains a typo in the word 'episode'.

3. README.md:1

• Draft comment:
  Ensure a copyright notice is present at the top of this file. This is required for all Python files.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The README file is missing a copyright notice at the top, which is a requirement for all Python files.

Workflow ID: wflow_WGrRbrqRRQneD8Jw

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.