feat(request): Add Proxy-Authorization as a sensitive header

[jonathroth]

No description provided.

[cleptric]

Thanks! Did these values show up in the Sentry UI, or did server-side scrubbing redact them?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.23%. Comparing base (00f7f6c) to head (b96f906).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #859   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.23%   82.23%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        4626     4626           
=======================================
  Hits         3804     3804           
  Misses        669      669           
  Partials      153      153           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jonathroth]

Thanks! Did these values show up in the Sentry UI, or did server-side scrubbing redact them?

I was debugging the SDK locally and noticed this value would be passed to Sentry. I haven't checked anything against the UI or server side yet, but the SDK shouldn't send this sensitive value to the server when PII is disabled

[cleptric]

Yes, I just wanted to also make sure our scrubbers work correctly in this case.