Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[mono][jit] Enable all X86Base intrinsics #91393

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jandupej
Copy link
Member

@jandupej jandupej commented Aug 31, 2023

Support for System.Runtime.Intrinsics.X86.DivRem is added here. This should mirror CoreCLR's #66551 and address #82195.

EDIT: This also adds support for DivRem on LLVM, as well as BitScanForward and BitScanReverse on mini.

@jandupej jandupej added NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) NO-REVIEW Experimental/testing PR, do NOT review it area-Codegen-JIT-mono labels Aug 31, 2023
@jandupej jandupej added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 31, 2023
@jandupej jandupej self-assigned this Aug 31, 2023
@huoyaoyuan
Copy link
Member

After this is done, I can finish the refine of decimal calculator.

@jandupej jandupej changed the title [mono][jit] Support for DivRem intrinsic on x86-64. [mono][jit] Enable all X86Base intrinsics Sep 5, 2023
@jandupej jandupej removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) NO-REVIEW Experimental/testing PR, do NOT review it labels Sep 5, 2023
@jandupej
Copy link
Member Author

jandupej commented Sep 7, 2023

All CI failures are known issues unrelated to this PR.

Copy link
Member

@fanyang-mono fanyang-mono left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jandupej
Copy link
Member Author

jandupej commented Sep 8, 2023

Got an occurrence of #90458

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants