Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dojo-client partial world syncer #630

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 8, 2023
Merged

dojo-client partial world syncer #630

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 8, 2023

Conversation

kariy
Copy link
Member

@kariy kariy commented Jul 11, 2023

Just a draft. May or may not be merged

  • is wasmable?

Adds a type in the dojo-client which allows to sync a set of entities' component values.

@kariy kariy force-pushed the dojo-client branch 2 times, most recently from d88b72f to 666cac3 Compare August 7, 2023 04:27
@kariy kariy changed the title [WIP] dojo-client state [WIP] dojo-client partial world syncer Aug 7, 2023
@kariy kariy requested a review from tarrencev August 7, 2023 23:47
Copy link
Contributor

@tarrencev tarrencev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking really good!

crates/dojo-client/src/storage.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/dojo-client/src/sync.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kariy
Copy link
Member Author

kariy commented Aug 8, 2023

@tarrencev should we keep the client example? i put that just to help making sense and explaining how it would be used.

@kariy kariy changed the title [WIP] dojo-client partial world syncer dojo-client partial world syncer Aug 8, 2023
@kariy kariy marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2023 09:41
@tarrencev tarrencev merged commit 5c3d66d into main Aug 8, 2023
@tarrencev tarrencev deleted the dojo-client branch August 8, 2023 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants