Update devcontainer image: v1.0.1 #2694
Conversation
WalkthroughOhayo, sensei! This pull request primarily updates the Docker image version across various configuration files related to the Rust development environment. The image version has been incremented from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
🔇 Additional comments (5).github/workflows/bench.yml (2)Line range hint Since we're updating the container image, it would be wise to verify that this version change doesn't introduce any significant variations in benchmark results, especially given the configured alert threshold of 130%. Let's check recent benchmark results: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check recent benchmark results for significant variations
# Look for benchmark result files
echo "Searching for benchmark results..."
fd -e txt -e json "bench|output"
# Check git history for recent benchmark changes
echo "Checking recent benchmark history..."
git log -p --since="1 week ago" -- "*bench*" "*output*"
The Docker image version has been updated from Let's verify the consistency of image versions across all workflow files: Also applies to: 39-39 .github/workflows/ci.yml (3)
The Docker image version has been updated to
This maintains consistency throughout the CI pipeline. Also applies to: 126-126, 142-142, 157-157, 166-166, 175-175
The image version update to Let's verify the image exists and check its changes: ✅ Verification successfulOhayo sensei! The Docker image update is verified and looks good! The Docker image 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Docker image exists and its changes
# Check if the image exists and get its details
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
"/users/dojoengine/packages/container/dojo-dev/versions" | \
jq '.[] | select(.metadata.container.tags[] == "v1.0.1")'
Length of output: 773
The workflow uses custom runners with specific core configurations. Let's ensure the new image works optimally with these setups. Let's check the image's resource specifications: Also applies to: 126-126, 142-142, 157-157, 166-166, 175-175 ✅ Verification successfulThe image is compatible with the specified runner configurations Ohayo sensei! After analyzing the workflow file, I can confirm the image compatibility:
The image is working as expected across all runner types! 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Docker image resource specifications
# Get the image configuration to check resource requirements
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
"/users/dojoengine/packages/container/dojo-dev/versions" | \
jq '.[] | select(.metadata.container.tags[] == "v1.0.1") | .metadata.container.config'
Length of output: 198 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the workflow file to understand the image usage patterns
cat .github/workflows/ci.yml
Length of output: 6068 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any resource constraints or requirements specified in the workflow
rg -A 3 -B 3 "runs-on|container:" .github/workflows/ci.yml
Length of output: 2229 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any documented requirements or changes
fd README.md | xargs cat
Length of output: 33954 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any issues or discussions about the image
gh issue list --repo dojoengine/dojo-dev --state all --search "v1.0.1"
gh pr list --repo dojoengine/dojo-dev --state all --search "v1.0.1"
Length of output: 231 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2694 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 56.34% 56.34%
=======================================
Files 411 411
Lines 52742 52742
=======================================
Hits 29719 29719
Misses 23023 23023 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores