Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show proper member address when editing existing role #2419

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024

Conversation

adamgall
Copy link
Member

@adamgall adamgall commented Oct 18, 2024

Don't even attempt to show "display name" in member field when editing role with non-ENS member.

This is what happens on develop right now when you go to edit a role and that existing role's member doesn't have an ENS name:

Screenshot 2024-10-18 at 2 29 07 PM

Obviously that "member" field is wrong. We should be displaying either the reverse record ENS name, or the full address.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Deploy Preview for decent-interface-dev ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit daa75eb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/decent-interface-dev/deploys/6712aac11a08b60008e52fad
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2419.app.dev.decentdao.org
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@adamgall adamgall changed the title Show proper member address when editing existing role Oct 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@DarksightKellar DarksightKellar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@adamgall adamgall merged commit 4881120 into develop Oct 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@adamgall adamgall deleted the fix-edit-role-with-non-ens-member branch October 19, 2024 11:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants