Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add markerIndent and contentIndent to ListItem #303

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

robinst
Copy link
Collaborator

@robinst robinst commented Jan 16, 2024

This information is required for a renderer producing Markdown :).

This information is required for a renderer producing Markdown.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8cf87a3) 94.28% compared to head (ec66829) 94.30%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #303      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     94.28%   94.30%   +0.01%     
  Complexity      227      227              
============================================
  Files           124      124              
  Lines          3625     3633       +8     
  Branches        549      549              
============================================
+ Hits           3418     3426       +8     
  Misses          104      104              
  Partials        103      103              
Files Coverage Δ
.../java/org/commonmark/internal/ListBlockParser.java 97.14% <100.00%> (ø)
...n/java/org/commonmark/internal/ListItemParser.java 95.45% <100.00%> (+0.45%) ⬆️
...rk/src/main/java/org/commonmark/node/ListItem.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@robinst robinst merged commit 85f043e into main Jan 17, 2024
10 checks passed
@robinst robinst deleted the list-item-indents branch January 17, 2024 00:26
robinst added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Makes use of #303 which was split out.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants