Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update material-ui monorepo #1464

Merged

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Dec 23, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@mui/icons-material (source) 6.2.1 -> 6.3.0 age adoption passing confidence
@mui/lab (source) 6.0.0-beta.20 -> 6.0.0-beta.21 age adoption passing confidence
@mui/material (source) 6.2.1 -> 6.3.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

mui/material-ui (@​mui/icons-material)

v6.3.0

Compare Source

Dec 23, 2024

A big thanks to the 11 contributors who made this release possible. Here are some highlights ✨:

  • Fix invalid HTML structure in the Accordion component (#​44408) @​ZeeshanTamboli
    The HTML elements of the Accordion summary have been updated:
    • the root element is now button (previously div).
    • summary content and the icon wrapper are now span (previously div).
      This will only impact you if you used the HTML element as selectors in your styles.
@mui/material@6.3.0
@mui/system@6.3.0
Docs
Core

All contributors of this release in alphabetical order: @​aarongarciah, @​alelthomas, @​DiegoAndai, @​Janpot, @​lewxdev, @​LukasTy, @​romgrk, @​sai6855, @​siriwatknp, @​yash49, @​ZeeshanTamboli


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@forking-renovate forking-renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Dec 23, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on updating the Material-UI package dependencies in the Client/package.json file. The changes involve incrementing the version numbers for three key Material-UI packages: @mui/icons-material, @mui/lab, and @mui/material. These updates represent minor version upgrades from 6.2.1 to 6.3.0 for icons and material packages, and from 6.0.0-beta.20 to 6.0.0-beta.21 for the lab package.

Changes

File Change Summary
Client/package.json - Updated @mui/icons-material from 6.2.1 to 6.3.0
- Updated @mui/lab from 6.0.0-beta.20 to 6.0.0-beta.21
- Updated @mui/material from 6.2.1 to 6.3.0

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • marcelluscaio
  • jennifer-gan

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad2af34 and 3a4aa2f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Client/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Client/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Client/package.json (3)

17-19: Yo dawg, check these version mismatches!

The Material-UI packages seem to be running at different major versions which could lead to compatibility issues:

  • Core packages (@mui/material, @mui/icons-material) at version 6.x
  • X-packages (@mui/x-charts, @mui/x-data-grid, @mui/x-date-pickers) at version 7.x

Let's check the peer dependencies real quick:


17-17: Mom's spaghetti time: verify those breaking changes!

The update to v6.3.0 includes HTML structure changes in the Accordion component and TypeScript improvements. Let's verify the impact:

Also applies to: 19-19

✅ Verification successful

Yo, this upgrade's clean like mom's kitchen - no impact detected!

The search results show no usage of either Accordion components or useAutocomplete hooks in the codebase. While the package is being updated, none of the breaking changes in v6.3.0 will affect the current implementation since these components aren't being used.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potentially affected components

# Search for Accordion usage
echo "Checking Accordion usage..."
rg "Accordion" --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx -A 2

# Search for useAutocomplete usage
echo "Checking useAutocomplete usage..."
rg "useAutocomplete" --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx -A 2

Length of output: 327


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type restrictions since jsx/tsx extensions aren't recognized
echo "Checking Accordion usage..."
rg "Accordion" -l

echo "Checking useAutocomplete usage..."
rg "useAutocomplete" -l

# Also check for imports specifically
echo "Checking MUI imports..."
rg "@mui/material/Accordion|@mui/material.*Accordion" -l
rg "@mui/material/useAutocomplete|@mui/material.*useAutocomplete" -l

Length of output: 370


18-18: Heads up about that beta package, eh!

Using @mui/lab at version 6.0.0-beta.21 in production could be risky, as beta versions may contain breaking changes or unstable features. Consider:

  1. Using stable alternatives from @mui/material if available
  2. Pinning to a specific beta version (which you're already doing, good job!)
  3. Having comprehensive tests to catch any beta-related issues

Let's see what components you're using from @mui/lab:

✅ Verification successful

The previous command failed because the file type 'jsx' wasn't recognized. Let's try a broader search to catch any references to @mui/lab and also check what other MUI packages are being used for context.


Let's dig deeper to see exactly what components we're importing from @mui/lab to determine if there are stable alternatives available in @mui/material.


Yo, my hands are shaking on the keyboard, but we gotta find those lab components! Let's try a broader search pattern to catch any references to @mui/lab in the source files and check the dependency tree in package-lock.json.


Yo, about that @mui/lab beta - we're actually good here!

The only components being used from @mui/lab are:

  • LoadingButton (used in multiple places for loading states)
  • TabContext, TabList, and TabPanel (used in account-related components)

These are stable components that have been in @mui/lab for a while, and the beta version is actually aligned with your @mui/material version (6.3.0). The components you're using are well-tested and commonly used parts of the MUI ecosystem.

  • LoadingButton has been a stable feature since MUI v5
  • The Tab components (TabContext, TabList, TabPanel) are mature and reliable

Keep that beta version pinned (which you're already doing), and you're good to go! 🍝

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find @mui/lab component usage

# Search for @mui/lab imports
rg "from '@mui/lab" --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx -A 1

Length of output: 99


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find @mui/lab usage
# First, let's search without file type restrictions
rg "@mui/lab" -l

# Also check package.json to see what other MUI packages are used
cat Client/package.json

Length of output: 2105


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check what specific components from @mui/lab are being used
rg "from '@mui/lab'" -A 1 Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/ProfilePanel.jsx Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/PasswordPanel.jsx Client/src/Components/TabPanels/Account/TeamPanel.jsx Client/src/Components/Dialog/index.jsx Client/src/Pages/Settings/index.jsx Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/CreatePageSpeed/index.jsx

# Also check if there are any direct imports from @mui/lab without destructuring
rg "import.*@mui/lab'$" Client/src/

Length of output: 371


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try one more time with a simpler grep pattern
rg -B 1 -A 1 "@mui/lab" Client/src/

# Also check the package-lock.json to see if there are any other MUI lab dependencies
rg "@mui/lab" Client/package-lock.json -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 5925


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR contains only dependency updates with no changes to core logic, support code, or configuration with logic impact.

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team

@ajhollid ajhollid merged commit 2efd26d into bluewave-labs:develop Dec 24, 2024
1 check passed
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/material-ui-monorepo branch December 24, 2024 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants