Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: no extra port mapping in main container when nlb target is a sidecar #3819

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 27, 2022

Conversation

Lou1415926
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #3768

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the Apache 2.0 License.

@Lou1415926 Lou1415926 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 26, 2022 21:49
@Lou1415926 Lou1415926 requested review from efekarakus and removed request for a team July 26, 2022 21:49
Protocol: tcp
{{- end }}
{{- if .NLB}} {{ $nlbListener := .NLB.Listener }}
{{- if and (eq $nlbListener.TargetContainer .WorkloadName) (ne $nlbListener.TargetPort .NLB.MainContainerPort)}}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:ack: this looks good, what about this feedback from the issue:

It appears that the cf partial below is not sidecar aware, and assumes that the nlb target is always the main workload container.

To me it sounded like the NLB target group is pointing to the wrong port?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Lou1415926 Lou1415926 Jul 26, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With a manifest like this:

nlb:
  port: 80/tcp
  target_container: envoy

image:
  location: blah
  port: 10000

sidecars:
  envoy:
    # envoy admin port
    port: 9901
    image: public.ecr.aws/hashicorp/envoy-alpine:latest

The NLB target group's target port will be 9901, not 10000, with the current implementation and as expected!

My understanding for the quoted comment was specifically for the code:

{{if ne .NLB.Listener.TargetPort .NLB.MainContainerPort}} {{/*No need to add additional port if the target port is the same as image port*/}}

The (bugged) code assume the target container is main container, and add the target port to main container's port mapping if it's not the same as the container port. It fails to take into consideration the possibility that the target container could be a sidecar, in which case, it does not need to add the extra port mapping to the main container.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation, totally makes sense!

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 3fbc49d into aws:mainline Jul 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Load Balanced Web Service: incompatibility when nlb and sidecars are used together
3 participants