Merge release 6 #1439
Merge release 6 #1439
Conversation
…riptions-in-sync-status GO-3844: Fix and simplify subscriptions for sync status
WalkthroughThe recent changes streamline the synchronization process by removing file-specific handling in several components, focusing solely on object subscriptions. Key methods and structures related to file synchronization have been eliminated, simplifying the overall control flow and enhancing maintainability. This refactoring reflects a shift towards a more object-centric model in the synchronization architecture. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Runner
participant Workflow
participant SDK
participant SyncStatus
participant Test
Runner->>Workflow: Trigger build
Workflow->>SDK: Check conditions
alt SDK install required
SDK-->>Workflow: Install SDK
end
Runner->>SyncStatus: Sync objects
SyncStatus-->>Runner: Report sync status
Runner->>Test: Run tests
Test-->>Runner: Validate object sync
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](/~https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
- core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go (4 hunks)
- core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus_test.go (3 hunks)
- core/syncstatus/syncsubscriptions/syncingobjects.go (4 hunks)
- core/syncstatus/syncsubscriptions/syncsubscriptions.go (1 hunks)
- core/syncstatus/syncsubscriptions/syncsubscriptions_test.go (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
core/syncstatus/syncsubscriptions/syncsubscriptions.go (2)
Line range hint
16-64:
LGTM!The
syncSubscriptionsstruct and its methods align with the updatedSyncSubscriptionsinterface. The changes are approved.
Line range hint
11-14:
LGTM! But verify the impact of removed methods.The removal of
GetFileSubscriptionandFileSyncingObjectsCountmethods simplifies theSyncSubscriptioninterface and aligns it with an object-centric model.However, ensure that all references to these methods have been removed or updated in the codebase.
Verification successful
Verification successful!
All references to the removed methods
GetFileSubscriptionandFileSyncingObjectsCounthave been successfully eliminated from the codebase.
- No occurrences of
GetFileSubscriptionorFileSyncingObjectsCountwere found in the Go files.- No references to these methods were found in comments or documentation.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the removed methods. # Test: Search for references to `GetFileSubscription` and `FileSyncingObjectsCount`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'GetFileSubscription|FileSyncingObjectsCount'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify all references to the removed methods with additional checks. # Test: Search for references to `GetFileSubscription` and `FileSyncingObjectsCount` in Go files. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'GetFileSubscription|FileSyncingObjectsCount' # Additional check: Search for references in comments or documentation. rg --type go '//.*GetFileSubscription|//.*FileSyncingObjectsCount'Length of output: 129
core/syncstatus/syncsubscriptions/syncingobjects.go (2)
Line range hint
34-49:
LGTM!The
Runmethod has been simplified by removing logic associated withfileReqand its related subscription management. The changes improve maintainability and are approved.
9-11: LGTM! But verify the impact of removed fields and methods.The removal of the
fileSubscriptionfield and related methods simplifies thesyncingObjectsstruct and aligns it with an object-centric model.However, ensure that all references to these fields and methods have been removed or updated in the codebase.
Verification successful
Verification complete: No references to
fileSubscriptionorGetFileSubscriptionfound.The removal of the
fileSubscriptionfield and related methods from thesyncingObjectsstruct has been verified, and no lingering references were found in the codebase.
- No occurrences of
fileSubscriptionorGetFileSubscriptionwere found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the removed fields and methods. # Test: Search for references to `fileSubscription` and `GetFileSubscription`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'fileSubscription|GetFileSubscription'Length of output: 2584
core/syncstatus/syncsubscriptions/syncsubscriptions_test.go (1)
Line range hint
28-81:
LGTM!The test function
TestSyncSubscriptionshas been modified to remove references to file synchronization. The changes simplify the test's purpose and are approved.core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go (3)
Line range hint
272-292:
Verify the impact of removingfilesSyncingCounton sync event handling.The removal of the
filesSyncingCountparameter simplifies the data being processed in sync events. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact the handling and reporting of synchronization events.Verification successful
Verification successful: Removal of
filesSyncingCountThe removal of the
filesSyncingCountparameter does not negatively impact the handling and reporting of synchronization events. The codebase has been updated accordingly, and no references tofilesSyncingCountremain.
- No occurrences of
filesSyncingCountfound in the codebase.- Calls to
makeSyncEventare consistent with the updated parameters.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `filesSyncingCount` on sync event handling. # Test: Search for the usage of `filesSyncingCount` in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'filesSyncingCount'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `filesSyncingCount` on sync event handling. # Test: Search for the usage of `filesSyncingCount` in the entire codebase. Expect: No occurrences. rg 'filesSyncingCount' --type go -A 5 # Test: Search for the usage of `makeSyncEvent` to ensure that the changes do not affect its calls. rg 'makeSyncEvent' --type go -A 5Length of output: 1371
Line range hint
205-214:
Verify the impact of removingfilesSyncingCounton sync event handling.The removal of the
filesSyncingCountparameter simplifies the data being processed in sync events. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact the handling and reporting of synchronization events.Verification successful
Verified: The removal of
filesSyncingCountdoes not negatively impact the synchronization event handling.
- The
updateSpaceSyncStatusmethod now processesobjectsSyncingCountand other parameters.- No remaining references to
filesSyncingCountwere found in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `filesSyncingCount` on sync event handling. # Test: Search for the usage of `filesSyncingCount` in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'filesSyncingCount'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `filesSyncingCount` on sync event handling. # Search for any remaining references to `filesSyncingCount` in the codebase. rg --type go 'filesSyncingCount' # Search for the definition of the `updateSpaceSyncStatus` method to understand its current implementation. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func updateSpaceSyncStatus($_) { $$$ }' # Search for the usage of the `updateSpaceSyncStatus` method to see how it is currently being called. rg --type go 'updateSpaceSyncStatus'Length of output: 413
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of the `updateSpaceSyncStatus` method to verify its current state. # Extract the implementation of `updateSpaceSyncStatus` method from `core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (s *spaceSyncStatus) updateSpaceSyncStatus(spaceId string) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1774
Line range hint
73-82:
Verify the impact of removingfilesSyncingCounton sync event handling.The removal of the
filesSyncingCountparameter simplifies the data being processed in sync events. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact the handling and reporting of synchronization events.Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Impact from Removal of
filesSyncingCountThe removal of the
filesSyncingCountparameter does not affect the handling and reporting of synchronization events. ThesendEventToSessionmethod and its usage withinsendSyncEventForNewSessionfunction correctly without it.
- The
sendEventToSessionmethod does not includefilesSyncingCountin its parameters.- The
sendSyncEventForNewSessionmethod callssendEventToSessionusing only the space ID and session ID.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `filesSyncingCount` on sync event handling. # Test: Search for the usage of `filesSyncingCount` in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'filesSyncingCount'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the `sendEventToSession` method in the codebase. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func sendEventToSession($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Search for the usage of the `sendEventToSession` method in the codebase. rg --type go 'sendEventToSession'Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract lines around the implementation and usage of `sendEventToSession` in `core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go`. # Extract the implementation of `sendEventToSession` rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 'func (s *spaceSyncStatus) sendEventToSession(spaceId, token string)' core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go # Extract the usage of `sendEventToSession` rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 's.sendEventToSession(id, ctx.ID())' core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.goLength of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and implementation of `sendEventToSession` in core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go rg --type go 'func (s *spaceSyncStatus) sendEventToSession' core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go -A 20 # Verify the usage of `sendEventToSession` in core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go rg --type go 's.sendEventToSession' core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus.go -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 486
core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus_test.go (1)
95-98: Verify the impact of consolidating object generation on test setup and coverage.The removal of the separate handling of file objects simplifies the object generation process. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact the test setup and coverage.
Verification successful
The consolidation of object generation in
genSyncingObjectsis well-covered in the test filecore/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus_test.go.The multiple occurrences of
genSyncingObjectsin different test cases indicate that the change should not negatively impact the test setup or coverage.
core/syncstatus/spacesyncstatus/spacestatus_test.go: Multiple usages ofgenSyncingObjectsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of consolidating object generation on test setup and coverage. # Test: Search for the usage of `genFileObject` in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go -A 5 $'genFileObject'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of consolidating object generation on test setup and coverage. # Test: Search for the usage of `genSyncingObjects` in the test files. rg --type go -A 5 'genSyncingObjects'Length of output: 6927
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
85-85: Verify the impact of the new condition on workflow compatibility.The change alters the control flow of the workflow, potentially affecting which runners can execute the SDK installation step based on the specified input rather than solely on the OS and version. Ensure that this change does not negatively impact the compatibility of the workflow with different architectures.
Verification successful
The new condition does not negatively impact the workflow compatibility.
The condition
if: github.event.inputs.run-on-runner != 'ARM64'ensures that specific steps are skipped when the runner is 'ARM64', which is consistent with the intended control flow. The workflow handles different architectures appropriately by using this condition.
- The
run-on-runnerinput is used to set the runner and conditionally execute steps.- The condition ensures that steps are skipped for 'ARM64' runners, maintaining compatibility.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the new condition on workflow compatibility. # Test: Search for the usage of the `run-on-runner` input in the workflow file. Expect: No occurrences of incompatible conditions. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'run-on-runner'Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the new condition on workflow compatibility. # Test: Search for the usage of the `run-on-runner` input in the workflow file. Expect: No occurrences of incompatible conditions. rg 'run-on-runner' .github/workflows/build.yml -A 10Length of output: 3536
Description
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Related Tickets & Documents
Mobile & Desktop Screenshots/Recordings
Added tests?
Added to documentation?
[optional] Are there any post-deployment tasks we need to perform?