Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Task209 stance detection #128

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 2, 2021

Conversation

Maitreyapatel
Copy link
Contributor

I have created task .json file for stance detection.

"Maitreya Patel"
],
"Source": [
"Unsupervised Stance Detection for Arguments from Consequences by Kobbe et. al."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you include a url to the data source?

"Categories": [
"Classification"
],
"Definition": "Given the Target and Argument texts detect the stance that the argument has towards the topic. There are three types of stances \"in favor\", \"against\", and \"neither\". ",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it make sense to change "neither" to "neutral"?

@danyaljj
Copy link
Contributor

Few suggestions; otherwise, it looks good to me!

@danyaljj danyaljj requested a review from swarooprm August 31, 2021 16:05
@danyaljj
Copy link
Contributor

danyaljj commented Sep 1, 2021

Thanks! Looks good to me!

Copy link
Contributor

@swarooprm swarooprm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!
One comment: See if you can create other tasks from the same dataset. The data creation process in the paper may help you in this direction.

@swarooprm swarooprm merged commit dceed0d into allenai:master Sep 2, 2021
@Maitreyapatel Maitreyapatel deleted the task209-stance-detection branch September 2, 2021 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants