Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Generate multiline by default #3315

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

sfc-gh-asawicki
Copy link
Collaborator

@sfc-gh-asawicki sfc-gh-asawicki commented Dec 20, 2024

Enable generating multiline config building:

  • use overrides to decide what type of method should be generated
  • add it to the known cases (all user types, all function types, and all procedure types)
  • apply change only to resource models; it is still an extension method for the provider config model
  • adjusted existing models and acceptance tests

Copy link

Integration tests failure for 6946308d26182ad2264aa4fd3fc5d7d7e736b3bc

1 similar comment
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Integration tests failure for 6946308d26182ad2264aa4fd3fc5d7d7e736b3bc

@sfc-gh-asawicki sfc-gh-asawicki marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 16:04
@sfc-gh-asawicki sfc-gh-asawicki merged commit 292d1fe into dev Jan 8, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@sfc-gh-asawicki sfc-gh-asawicki deleted the generate-multiline-by-default branch January 8, 2025 16:38
sfc-gh-jcieslak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2025
Enable generating multiline config building:
- use overrides to decide what type of method should be generated
- add it to the known cases (all user types, all function types, and all procedure types)
- apply change only to resource models; it is still an extension method for the provider config model
- adjusted existing models and acceptance tests
sfc-gh-jcieslak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2025
Enable generating multiline config building:
- use overrides to decide what type of method should be generated
- add it to the known cases (all user types, all function types, and all procedure types)
- apply change only to resource models; it is still an extension method for the provider config model
- adjusted existing models and acceptance tests
sfc-gh-jcieslak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[1.0.2](v1.0.1...v1.0.2)
(2025-01-20)


### 🔧 **Misc**

* Generate ID and ObjectType Show Object Methods
([#3292](#3292))
([f7ff70a](f7ff70a))
* Generate multiline by default
([#3315](#3315))
([520bb4c](520bb4c))
* Overview of the grant ownership resource
([#3342](#3342))
([9f891d6](9f891d6))
* Update docs and migration guide
([#3313](#3313))
([59e333a](59e333a))


### 🐛 **Bug fixes:**

* Fixes in account parameters
([#3310](#3310))
([96a1f17](96a1f17))
* Handle optional account fields in the state upgrader correctly
([#3330](#3330))
([4eae4c8](4eae4c8)),
closes
[#3332](#3332)
* Small fixes
([#3337](#3337))
([8807839](8807839))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](/~https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](/~https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: snowflake-release-please[bot] <105954990+snowflake-release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants