Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corfunc Docs #2823

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Corfunc Docs #2823

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

lucas-wilkins
Copy link
Contributor

New corfunc docs, see #2674 for details.

@lucas-wilkins lucas-wilkins requested review from smk78 and butlerpd March 15, 2024 10:07
@lucas-wilkins lucas-wilkins added the SasView 6.0.0 Required for 6.0.0 release label Mar 15, 2024
@smk78
Copy link
Contributor

smk78 commented Mar 25, 2024

This is a nice set of documentation. I can see the Theory one becoming a quasi-primary reference once it's discoverable!

A few things I spotted:

In corfunc-theory:
In Overview:
Typo: In "such that there is no spatial correlations between particles" replace "is" by "are"
In Formal Description:
"t" and "s" are undefined
In the Gamma1 projection:
Typo: "This the case" should presumably be "This is the case"?
In the Gamma3 projection:
Typo: "stradians" should be "steradians"
In the second equation phi is undefined
The equation under the line "Where phi is a solid angle element" needs reformatting as it incorporates some text

In corfunc-technical:
In Transformation:
Could give the equation for Q*, I guess?
In Interpretation:
Can we give the definition of the Stribeck polydispersity

In corfunc-how-to:
In Options:
Typo: In "where there is small errors in the transformed data" replace "is" by "are"
Typo: In "such as hard block is calculated" replace "is" by "are"
In Output:
Please could we add a note warning that if the transformed data CSV file is read back into SasView it will be interpreted as (Q,I(Q),dI,dQ)!!!

@smk78
Copy link
Contributor

smk78 commented Mar 25, 2024

Functionality test on W10/x64 of Github Actions build 8294510082.

All good and doing as expected... until I clicked on the floppy disk in the plot navigation menu to save the plot, whereupon this popped up in the Log Explorer:

ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last): File "matplotlib\backends\backend_qt.py", line 783, in save_figure TypeError: 'CorfuncWindow' object is not callable

Copy link
Contributor

@smk78 smk78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! Just a few documentation issues and (unfortunately) a bug saving plots.
See Conversation for details.

@lucas-wilkins lucas-wilkins requested a review from smk78 March 25, 2024 17:58
@lucas-wilkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a nice set of documentation. I can see the Theory one becoming a quasi-primary reference once it's discoverable!

A few things I spotted:

In corfunc-theory: In Overview: Typo: In "such that there is no spatial correlations between particles" replace "is" by "are" In Formal Description: "t" and "s" are undefined In the Gamma1 projection: Typo: "This the case" should presumably be "This is the case"? In the Gamma3 projection: Typo: "stradians" should be "steradians" In the second equation phi is undefined The equation under the line "Where phi is a solid angle element" needs reformatting as it incorporates some text

All done

In corfunc-technical: In Transformation: Could give the equation for Q*, I guess? In Interpretation: Can we give the definition of the Stribeck polydispersity

Opened new issue for these - #2835

In corfunc-how-to: In Options: Typo: In "where there is small errors in the transformed data" replace "is" by "are" Typo: In "such as hard block is calculated" replace "is" by "are" In Output: Please could we add a note warning that if the transformed data CSV file is read back into SasView it will be interpreted as (Q,I(Q),dI,dQ)!!!

Done

smk78 added 2 commits March 26, 2024 13:42
Copy link
Contributor

@smk78 smk78 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR is now suitable to merge. But note #2835

@butlerpd
Copy link
Member

The only failure is the apple notarization which is likely to continue until we can fix the CI for that. Is there a reason we should not merge this approved documentation change?

@butlerpd butlerpd merged commit 436b458 into release_6.0.0 Apr 2, 2024
38 checks passed
@butlerpd butlerpd deleted the fur_kit branch April 2, 2024 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
SasView 6.0.0 Required for 6.0.0 release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants