Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove build folder #86

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 5, 2014
Merged

remove build folder #86

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 5, 2014

Conversation

T045T
Copy link
Contributor

@T045T T045T commented Jun 5, 2014

remove the redundant build folder and have the examples use hosted versions of roslib.js instead. All examples have been tested with Hydro.

Plus another fix to advertise/unadvertise functionality.

@T045T T045T merged commit d2f67f2 into RobotWebTools:develop Jun 5, 2014
@rctoris
Copy link
Contributor

rctoris commented Jun 9, 2014

Issue re-opened. Bower packages are something that seems to be coming up a lot in various requests. If having the compiled library makes this easier, I think we should have it. It also makes testing the examples with local changes easier.

@T045T
Copy link
Contributor Author

T045T commented Jun 13, 2014

One more thing: bower supports commands like bower install roslibjs#develop to get the latest version. So I guess the build folder makes sense in the develop branch after all?

@rctoris
Copy link
Contributor

rctoris commented Jun 13, 2014

:p whomp. Okay, we can add it back then.

T045T added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2014
Also add back build folder, so users can do ```bower install roslibjs#develop``` - this should also put #85 and #86 to rest.

[ ] [Register](http://bower.io/#registering-packages) roslibjs with bower
k-aguete pushed a commit to k-aguete/roslibjs that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
Fix for ROS3D.Viewer clear color, use parseInt in order to convert hex s...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants