-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[bugfix] to concat input squash #39593
[bugfix] to concat input squash #39593
Conversation
Thanks for your contribution! |
PR-CI-Model-benchmark
|
if (is_concat_signed && is_input_unsigned) { | ||
VLOG(4) << "Do not squash dequant-quant, because " | ||
<< "is_concat_signed: " << is_concat_signed | ||
<< ", is_input_unsigned: " << is_input_unsigned << "."; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a check if the next operator is concat
or elementwise
, because only these operators have several inputs and they all have to have the same data type.
For elementwise check, you can add a comment to remove it when the BinaryMkldnn kernel will support two different data types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
I have reverted fix to PTQ to restore LSTM test to working until we find a way to properly fix it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@sfraczek Is Coverage CI randomly failing ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This PR fixes yolo_darknet and yolo_mobilenet
@baoachun there is no information why coverage build failed. Only that it's linker error. Can you tell if it's run out of space or not? I did rerun it once already and it still fails. I can open PR that adds verbose flags to linker hoping that it will show why it failed. What do you think? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
PR types
Bug fixes
PR changes
Others
Describe
Bugfix to bugfix #39346