editoast: move rolling stock and rs with liveries to schemas to schemas

[Wadjetz]

part of #7048

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.11765% with 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.34%. Comparing base (d2fdf2d) to head (31c0071).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Files	Patch %	Lines
front/src/modules/rollingStock/types.ts	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #7128      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     28.34%   28.34%   -0.01%     
  Complexity     2247     2247              
============================================
  Files          1097     1096       -1     
  Lines        137950   137931      -19     
  Branches       2761     2754       -7     
============================================
- Hits          39103    39094       -9     
+ Misses        97247    97239       -8     
+ Partials       1600     1598       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	79.12% <ø> (+0.14%)	⬆️
editoast	72.83% <100.00%> (-0.07%)	⬇️
front	8.99% <85.71%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
gateway	2.45% <ø> (ø)
railjson_generator	87.15% <ø> (ø)
tests	83.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[leovalais]

Thanks for this PR. There are a few things to change, including some changes that went while I was off:

1. As stated in the tracking issue Isolate editoast::schema into an editoast_schemas crate #7048 (comment), there should be only one definition of RollingStock in editoast_schemas.
2. RollingStockWithLiveries is a view response, not a schema. It should be moved into views/.
3. Please reference the tracking issues in the description of the PR, that helps the review ;)

[woshilapin]

Looks good. Thanks.

[leovalais]

LGTM thanks!

[clarani]

LGTM ✅