-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
front: tests: refacto allowances e2e-tests #6697
front: tests: refacto allowances e2e-tests #6697
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #6697 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 27.87% 27.90% +0.02%
Complexity 2172 2172
============================================
Files 1043 1041 -2
Lines 128726 128667 -59
Branches 2569 2567 -2
============================================
+ Hits 35887 35906 +19
+ Misses 91354 91278 -76
+ Partials 1485 1483 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for this PR ! Left a few comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM !! Thank for your work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the fixes, allowancesManagement is nice.
One last thing that is available right now : when adding an engineering allowance like you do (without changing the interval range which takes the whole path by default), we can check that the input to add a new one is properly disabled
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, all tests passed
921cc8f
to
373c201
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm and tested good job !
- add data-testid where needed - clean createCompleteScenario in /assets/utils.ts to fit with global setup - edit some testId in scenario-page-model.ts
b49a870
to
85abd6b
Compare
close #5509