Bpt/editoast/parallel core requests

[Castavo]

closes #6581

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 26 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (eee07b8) 27.86% compared to head (8bac61a) 27.88%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on dev.

Files	Patch %	Lines
editoast/src/views/timetable/import.rs	0.00%	22 Missing ⚠️
editoast/src/core/mod.rs	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #6624      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     27.86%   27.88%   +0.01%     
+ Complexity     2178     2175       -3     
============================================
  Files          1042     1044       +2     
  Lines        127852   127897      +45     
  Branches       2610     2605       -5     
============================================
+ Hits          35627    35664      +37     
- Misses        90694    90714      +20     
+ Partials       1531     1519      -12     

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	79.36% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
editoast	75.21% <0.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
front	8.42% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
gateway	2.50% <ø> (ø)
railjson_generator	87.25% <ø> (ø)
tests	81.95% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[flomonster]

LGTM

[bloussou]

Can you show an execution time comparison on the benchmark to check that we are not introducing bugs (loosing some trains) and having better performances ?

[Castavo]

@bloussou I've run the benchmark, no errors are added, and the two all-stops payloads now run in about 2min each 😁

[bloussou]

Perfect !!