createOperations: make it work when transforming from/to a CompoundCRS with a DerivedVerticalCRS with ellipsoidal height #4176
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…S with a DerivedVerticalCRS with ellipsoidal height Such CompoundCRS is strictly speaking not OGC Topic 2 conformant, but can make sense from a practical point of view. Fixes OSGeo#4175
jjimenezshaw
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @rouault
I know that the "ellipsoidal vertical systems" are not in the standard. I got the idea from the 3D systems as wkt1 with the option --allow-ellipsoidal-height-as-vertical-crs.
With a derived vertical CRS a geoid model can be "simulated" locally (with "vertical offset" or "vertical offset and slope").
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Such CompoundCRS is strictly speaking not OGC Topic 2 conformant, but can make sense from a practical point of view.
Fixes #4175