Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Jiles-Atherton-based inductor/transformer model #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

martinholters
Copy link
Member

This is what you get from insufficient test coverage... These were broken since (at least) v0.8.0 / Julia 1.0. Fix is pretty straight-forward, but the new tests mainly make sure the model does something which is at least somewhat reasonable, but might not be anywhere close to the desired behavior.

And add tests to ensure they don't bit-rot again.
@martinholters
Copy link
Member Author

Updated the tests to at least make sure the small-signal behavior is close to a linear inductor/transformer. On the plus side, this also covers the linear inductor/transformer, which previously also was not tested. However, it still does not verify that the nonlinear behavior is reasonable. I'm afraid that's as good as it get for the moment, though.

@martinholters martinholters merged commit 003b5a0 into main Aug 5, 2021
@martinholters martinholters deleted the mh/fix_ja branch August 5, 2021 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant