Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

#566 Change to 681 for PLT_RADAR_ALT_TEST_LIGHT #569

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024
Merged

#566 Change to 681 for PLT_RADAR_ALT_TEST_LIGHT #569

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

jdahlblom
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jdahlblom jdahlblom requested a review from charliefoxtwo April 19, 2024 08:07
charliefoxtwo
charliefoxtwo approved these changes Apr 19, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@charliefoxtwo charliefoxtwo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The weird thing is this number is so different from all the others around it. I'm assuming you've tested this to verify it works?

@jdahlblom
Copy link
Contributor Author

jdahlblom commented Apr 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The weird thing is this number is so different from all the others around it. I'm assuming you've tested this to verify it works?

Yes it works and is listed in the same lua as 19108. The model viewer clearly stated that 19108 isn't used anymore.

@jdahlblom jdahlblom added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into DCS-Skunkworks:master with commit e7ccb14 Apr 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@jdahlblom jdahlblom deleted the Change-to-681-for-PLT_RADAR_ALT_TEST_LIGHT branch April 19, 2024 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@charliefoxtwo charliefoxtwo charliefoxtwo approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jdahlblom @charliefoxtwo