Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a code of conduct for the project #705

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 17, 2016
Merged

Create a code of conduct for the project #705

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 17, 2016

Conversation

meatballs
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@meatballs
Copy link
Member Author

I'd like to have this one in before we do the PyCon UK spring next week. Anyone have any thoughts on it?

@marcharper
Copy link
Member

No objections from me, though it's the sort of thing that I wish we didn't need to have.

It may benefit from a note in the enforcement section that says something like "While we pledge to take all reports seriously, please give others the benefit of the doubt initially: text is a medium lacking nuance and unintentional miscommunication is a common occurrence."

Also I wonder if there's a better place for this at the project level. However I don't see a way to have a readme for the entire Axelrod organization, so I guess this is the best place for now.

Two questions:

  • Are we not sufficiently following e.g. github's code of conduct? Or is this simply a case of explicit is better than implicit?
  • Would it be better to adopt the same code of conduct as e.g. github or python?

@drvinceknight
Copy link
Member

Also I wonder if there's a better place for this at the project level. However I don't see a way to have a readme for the entire Axelrod organization, so I guess this is the best place for now.

I think I like it here but we do have: http://axelrod-python.github.io/ (source: /~https://github.com/Axelrod-Python/Axelrod-Python.github.io) which is an option?

Two questions:

Are we not sufficiently following e.g. github's code of conduct? Or is this simply a case of explicit is better than implicit?

I think explicit is better than implicit.

Would it be better to adopt the same code of conduct as e.g. github or python?

I believe @meatballs has sourced this from somewhere.

My one comment would be: can we have a pointer from the contributing guidelines to the CoC (nothing much, just a simple sentence): http://axelrod.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials/contributing/guidelines.html

@marcharper
Copy link
Member

I'm happy enough with this (and I know @meatballs wants to get it in soon) so I gave it a positive review. Feel free to make the changes suggested in the comments above, it won't change my opinion either way.

@drvinceknight
Copy link
Member

OK, I'll merge. My request for a pointer from the contribution guidelines can also be added at another stage.

@drvinceknight drvinceknight merged commit d6e9b7e into master Sep 17, 2016
@drvinceknight drvinceknight deleted the coc branch September 17, 2016 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants