exrcheck: better tile checks in reduceMemory mode #928
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Peter Hillman <peterh@wetafx.co.nz>
meshula
reviewed
Feb 22, 2021
meshula
approved these changes
Feb 22, 2021
Signed-off-by: Peter Hillman <peterh@wetafx.co.nz>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Address out-of-memory report in https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=31072
Estimate of memory required to load a tiled image in scanline mode should round up image width to a multiple of the tile width. In this case the image width was small, but the tile width very wide, causing a large underestimate of memory requirement.
PR also adds tests for large tiles to the MultiPartInputFile tests.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hillman peterh@wetafx.co.nz