-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Drop support for legacy Python 2 #257
Conversation
.travis.yml
Outdated
@@ -30,7 +28,3 @@ script: | |||
|
|||
after_success: | |||
- codecov | |||
|
|||
branches: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why was this removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was removed so I could test my feature branch on Travis CI and be sure it was already passing, I didn't want to submit a broken PR to you!
I can put it restore it if you prefer, although I would recommend leaving it in so others (and you!) can also test their feature branches too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't mind WIP PRs, actually. I added this specifically so I wouldn't see two Travis builds on my own PR branches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Looks good on first glance.
We'll probably want to enforce keyword-only arguments in a number of places, but that can happen outside this PR. Other than the .travis.yml
change, I don't see any blockers to merging this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is looking great. Could you add back the branch filter on the .travis.yml
? Then this should be good to go.
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Jia <tesrin@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jimmy Jia <tesrin@gmail.com>
Updated! |
Thanks so much! |
You're welcome! Onwards with Python 3! |
Fixes #255.