Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: naming of modules #34

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: naming of modules #34

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vburckhardt
Copy link
Member

Description

Just some small changes in term of naming in example, to make it easier to follow.

Types of changes in this PR

No release required

  • Examples or tests (addition or updates of examples or tests)
  • Documentation update
  • CI-related update (pipeline, etc.)
  • Other changes that don't affect Terraform code

Release required

  • Bug fix (patch release (x.x.X): Change that fixes an issue and is compatible with earlier versions)
  • New feature (minor release (x.X.x): Change that adds functionality and is compatible with earlier versions)
  • Breaking change (major release (X.x.x): Change that is likely incompatible with previous versions)
Release notes content

Replace this text with information that users need to know about the bug fixes, features, and breaking changes. This information helps the merger write the commit message that is published in the release notes for the module.


Checklist for reviewers

  • If relevant, a test for the change is included or updated with this PR.
  • If relevant, documentation for the change is included or updated with this PR.

Merge actions for mergers

  • Merge by using "Squash and merge".

  • Use a relevant conventional commit message that is based on the PR contents and any release notes provided by the PR author.

    The commit message determines whether a new version of the module is needed, and if so, which semver increment to use (major, minor, or patch).

##############################################################################

module "create_sgr_rule" {
# Create a first security group with client security_group_rules + rules for internal ibm flows
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be better if we mention the 'optionally' here for the internal IBM rules. Create a first security group with the client security group rules and optionally the internal IBM flows rules.

@mounika-nalla
Copy link
Contributor

Is the default/outputs.tf is deliverately left empty? I would suggest to show the security_group_1.security_group_rule and security_group_2.security_group_rule

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Member

@vburckhardt Is this a change we still want to make?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants