-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 722
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BigInt to stage 4 #217
BigInt to stage 4 #217
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR is premature, for multiple reasons: the notes aren't released, the meeting hasn't concluded, and neither of these proposals is technically eligible for stage 4 at this time, so that consensus is thus conditional on meeting that criteria.
Oh sorry, I didn't know about that. Are these criteria should only be met by features that looking for stage 4? |
Yes - specifically, to be eligible for stage 4, editors have to have signed off on a PR to the spec repo. |
Indeed. Sorry for my rush. |
I think it's time to land this PR. |
tc39/ecma262#1515 has just received final editor approval today; as such, BigInt now meets all stage 4 criteria. Rebasing and merging. |
8fcecb5
to
9f0a8f0
Compare
No description provided.