Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(compiler): add
defineCustomElements
method & signature typedef #3619feat(compiler): add
defineCustomElements
method & signature typedef #3619Changes from 12 commits
c05fafe
afeab08
777a0b8
99d5d0d
2cb2159
dbd2ad6
247aaf5
2e87712
c6fa504
993cf22
45942cc
0bc1f02
bc5ecee
4db4009
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it our intention that the user could set
outputTarget.includeGlobalScripts
tonull
and have this condition evaluate to true? Seems off to me...(just because
null !== false
evaluates totrue
)we don't have to change that in this PR but just calling it out because I noticed it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That does seem off. I'm hesitant to change it just because that was the logic already in place, but I can make note of that and take a look outside the context of this PR (this is going into v3 anyway)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this setup a lot more 👍 things are cleanly factored and co-located