-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
switch integration tests to new test-utils #3898
Conversation
A new generated diff is ready to view.
A new doc preview is ready to view. |
A new generated diff is ready to view.
A new doc preview is ready to view. |
.build_uri() | ||
.to_string() | ||
.parse() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks weird. is this a 0.4 to 1.0 conversion? Why do we create a URI, stringify it, and then parse it as a URI?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a 0.4 to 1.0 conversion. This is the exact same code we had for going from 1.0 to 0.4 which you can see removed/relocated on L209
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
[package] | |||
name = "aws-smithy-checksums" | |||
version = "0.60.13" | |||
version = "0.70.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not that it really matters, but I would expect the next version to be v0.61.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hit this with the flexibile checksums work, 0.61.0
was already published and yanked: https://crates.io/crates/aws-smithy-checksums/versions
But I would probably expect 0.62.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point.
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ publish = false | |||
repository = "/~https://github.com/smithy-lang/smithy-rs" | |||
|
|||
[features] | |||
http_1x = ["dep:http-1x", "dep:http-body-1x", "aws-smithy-runtime-api/http-1x"] | |||
http_1x = ["dep:http-body-1x", "aws-smithy-runtime-api/http-1x"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI, the feature name was updated to http-1x
in the main branch, as the updated nightly compiler told us that those who used this feature were specifying http-1x
(and we tend to use a hyphen in feature names in our crates).
A new generated diff is ready to view.
A new doc preview is ready to view. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for going through so many places and updating each site carefully. I know CI is currently failing on server-related tests, but LGTM.
A new generated diff is ready to view.
A new doc preview is ready to view. |
A new generated diff is ready to view.
A new doc preview is ready to view. |
A new generated diff is ready to view.
A new doc preview is ready to view. |
A new generated diff is ready to view.
A new doc preview is ready to view. |
Motivation and Context
Follow up PR to #3888
Description
aws/sdk/integration-tests
to use thetest-util
feature(s) directly fromaws-smithy-http-client
rather thanaws-smithy-runtime
Refactoraws-smithy-http
to use `http-1.ximds
credentials provider in passing while tracking down a test failureAWS_EC2_METADATA_ENABLED=false
is set by default and was causing some test failures)I started pulling at some threads and found them to be quite load bearing (e.g.
inlineable/serialization_settings.rs
) and would require updating all of codegen to usehttp-1.x
. ~This PR is a bit of a half step with some stop gaps put into place (e.g. the newcompat
feature ofaws-smithy-http
or inlining a function) to prevent the need to update everything in a single PR. Future PR's will continue where I left off here. ~One lesson I learned the hard way was that our integration test
Cargo.toml
have to reflect codegen. I had updated them to all usehttp = "1"
and got it all working only to realize codegen generateshttp = "0.2.9"
andhttp-1x = { package = "http", version = "1"}
and thus the integration tests have to look the same as that.Future
aws-smithy-http
to upgrade tohttp-body-1.x
. ~http-1.x
UPDATE: I reverted the update to http 1.x for
aws-smithy-http
. This needs to be done and planned with the server and I don't want it to unnecessarily block hyper 1. We will pursue the remaining hyper 1 changes and then make a decision on internal use of http and http-body pre 1.x usage.By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.